“Russian street” as a Social Communication Phenomenon within the Context of the Early 20th Century Socio-Political Crisis

Author: Nazarov A.D.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Nazarov Alexander Danilovich, Dr. Sc. (Hist.), Professor at the Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Institute of Foreign Languages  of the Moscow Aviation Institute (MAI).

Abstract. The article is devoted to the analysis of the sociopolitical and social phenomenon that dominated the life of Russian society in the pre-revolutionary period and the years of the Civil War of 1917-1922, known in expert circles as the “Russian street”. This phenomenon is marked by a significant dynamic of spontaneous protest moods, accompanied by moral and psychological problems, hunger, illness, the “horrors of life” of the protracted war, the inability of the tsarist and then the Provisional Governments to reverse the situation that gives Russians a sense of hopelessness, bitterness and hopelessness.
At the same time, the “street” served as a center of a certain type of democracy, where everyone could take part in political life, demand recognition and feel the course of history. Workers from the outskirts of large cities who went to their centers thus declared the streets “their own”, while acts against well-dressed people served as an expression of “self-affirmation and public authority”. As the economic crisis increased, the number of thefts, robberies and murders in the capital and large cities grew. In the post-October period, lynching, “pogroms of wine” spread, city streets became even more “kingdom” of refugees and homeless people, including beggars, criminals, young homeless. The de-urbanization process that began, as evidence of the desperate situation of the townspeople, their outflow to the villages, undermined the social base of the working class, curtailed its political activity, protests of this kind more and more often poured out into the streets, expressions of dissatisfaction, disappointment and even resistance prevailed. Calls not to forget about the historical significance of the proletarian revolution and the bright future, solidarity and patience did not act on the workers. Strikes at factories and plants periodically continued throughout the entire Civil War.
Western experts are not inclined to romanticize these protests, believing that the myth of a rational and disciplined proletariat was thus dispelled, and the Bolshevik government began to rule more and more on its behalf. Moreover, the working class in the person of its avant-garde RCP (b) turned into the ruling party, participated in the creation of the state apparatus at all levels, which gave it the right to solve the acute problems that arose with the use of violent methods, replacing political methods in time as the discontent grew. Prof. Paul Avrich called the striking feat of the Bolsheviks their success in curbing the rush of the working masses to a chaotic utopia.

Keywords:  revolution, civil war, protest moods, «Russian street» as the epicenter of public actions and meanings, the proletariat, social and political crisis, street violence, children’s homelessness

Text: PDF

For citation: Nazarov A.D. “Russian street” as a Social Communication Phenomenon within the Context of the Early 20th Century Socio-Political Crisis. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 165–175. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-165-175.

References
Bondarenko V. (2017). Legends of the White Case. M.: Molodaya Gvardia (In Rus.).
Brubaker R. (2012). Ethnicity without groups / Transl. I. Borisova. M.: Higher School of Economics (In Rus.).
Ganin A. (2018). White on red. The workers 'and peasants' army was created by the personnel of the tsarist officers / A. Ganin. SEARCH. February 19th. P. 14-18 (In Rus.).
Civil war and military intervention in the USSR: Encyclopedia / Ed. S.S. Khromov. M.: Sov. Encyclopedia, 1983 (In Rus.).
Castells M. (2017 [2009]). Communication Power. M.: Higher School of Economics (In Rus.). Kolonitsky B.I., Matskevich M.G. (2018). Desacralization of the revolution and anti-revolutionary
consensus in modern Russia: the anniversary of 2017 and its political use / non-use / B.I. Kolonitsky, M.G. Matskevich. In: World of Russia. Volume 27. No. 4. P. 78-101 (In Rus.).
Lenin V.I. Report on the political activities of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) March 8. In: Pol. collected cit. Vol. 43 (In Rus.).
Merton R. (2006 [1968]). Social Theory and Social Structure. M.: AST.
Oleynikov Y.V. (2018). Verification of K. Marx’s revolutionary views. In: Philosophical Sciences.
No. 4. P. 27-44 (In Rus.).
Skocpol T. (2017 [1979]). States and social revolutions: a comparative analysis of France, Russia and China / Trensl. S. Moiseeva; ed. D. Karasev.. M.: Gaidar Institute Publishing House (In Rus.).
Steinberg M. (2018). The Great Russian Revolution, 1905-1921 / Transl. N. Edelman, ed. M. Gershzon. M.: Gaidar Institute Publishing House (In Rus.).
Fedotov-White D. (2018). War and revolution in Russia. M.: Publishing of the Tsiolkovsky bookstore (In Rus.).
Fitzpatrick S. (2018). The Russian Revolution / Transl. N. Edelman. M.: Gaidar Institute Publishing House (In Rus.).

Information and Psychological Security of Individual, as a Protection from Manipulation of Consciousness of Young People

Author: Sokolovskaya I.E., Shcherbakova O.I., Vasyakin B.S.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
okolovskaya Irina Eduardovna, Dr. Sc. (Psychol.), professor of psychology department of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
Shcherbakova Olga Ivanovna, Dr. Sc. (Psychol.), professor, professor of psychology department of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.
Vasyakin Bogdan Sergeevich, Cand. Sc. (Econ.), associate professor, head of the department of psychology of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics.

Abstract. This paper represents the basic solutions for creating reliable protection of the mass consciousness of the citizens of the Russian Federation from negative manipulative influences. An analysis of the actions and counter-actions of modern means of psychological weapons and ways to neutralize them are given. This protective complex, consisting of certain methods and technologies, is described in this work as a special type of opposition in the information space to aggressive influences that destroy and subordinate the collective mind. The method of protecting the consciousness of an individual and large groups of people is based on the technological and scientifically verified influence on the harmonious development of the younger generation and students.

Keywords: information and psychological security, psychological protection, national security, manipulation of consciousness, spiritual security of the individual                     

Text: PDF

For citation: Sokolovskaya I.E., Shcherbakova O.I., Vasyakin B.S. Information and Psychological Security of Individual, as a Protection from Manipulation of Consciousness of Young People. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 154–164. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-154-164.

References
Grachev G.V. (2000). Information and psychological security of personality: Theory and technology of psychological protection. Diss. dr. psychil. sc. Moscow (In Rus.).
Kislyakov P.A. (2018). Media education in teaching students to ensure information and psychological security. Media Education. No. 1. P. 107-109 (In Rus.).
Kravtsov D.N. (2017). Information and psychological weapons as a means of ensuring the protection of the national interests of the state. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 5. No.3. P. 78-89 (In Rus.).
Puyu Y.V. (2010). Socio-philosophical foundations of anthropology of manipulation. Diss. thesis dr. of philosophy. St. Petersburg (In Rus.).
Shcherbakova O.I. (2013). Training of conflictological culture of personality: Monograph. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Saarbrucken, Deutschland (In Rus.).
Shcherbakova O.I. (2017). Formation of managers’ stress management skills. In the collection of Materials in the 3d scientific and practical international conference “Modern training and coaching: new opportunities in business and education”, October 20, 2017. M.: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. P. 119-126 (In Rus.).
Shcherbakova O.I., Chernykh A.K., Balahanova D.K., Midova V.O. (2018). Stress control practices for mental balance improvement in academic sports // Teoriya i Praktika Fizicheskoy Kultury (Theory and Practice of Physical Cilture). Issue 9, 1 September 2018. P. 22-23.
Shcherbakova O.I., Svinoboy O.V. (2016). Socio-psychological training as a way of forming professionally important personal qualities of an employee of the internal Affairs bodies. Initiatives of the 21st century. No. 2. P. 45-47 (In Rus.).
Sokolovskaya I.E. (2010). Psychological health of the nation in the views of the patristic tradition. In: Psychological and pedagogical technologies in terms of innovative processes in medicine and education. Collection of scientific articles / ed.  Chuhrov M.G., Belobragina N.A. Novosibirsk-Kemer (In Rus.).
Sokolovskaya I.E. (2011). Spiritual security of the younger generation as the key to a healthy nation of the XXI century. In: Materials for the 4th International scientific videoconference with elements of the scientific school for youth, September 14-16, 2011. Novosibirsk (In Rus.).
Sokolovskaya I.E. (2018). Spiritual security in the field of mental health. In: Mental health and education: collection of articles on materials of the scientific congress “Mental health in XXI century”. Moscow: Gorodets.  P. 312-315 (In Rus.).
Sokolovskaya I.E., Yasin M.I. (2018). Mission and possibilities of religious belief in preservation of psychological health of the person of modern digital society. In: collected materials of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics 22-11-2018. P.17-23 (In Rus.).


The Meaning and the Origin of “Fake news” Concept

Author: Golovatskaya O.E.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Golovatskaya Olesya Evgenyevna, postgraduate student of the department of public relations and media policy, RANEPA.

Abstract. This scientific article is devoted to the study of the phenomenon of fake news as a new way of misleading the audience. The author examines the meaning and origin of the term «fake news», of its semantic analogue («information hoax»), analyzes existing scientific approaches to the study of this phenomenon, illustrating the conclusions with examples of this phenomenon in the media, social networks and on Internet resources, as well as graphic analytical information - the results of their research, conducted in the course of training and practical exercises using the information-analytical system «Medialogia». The scientific novelty of the research consists in the fact that the phenomenon «fake news» is still poorly studied and modestly described in the scientific literature, therefore, the author of the article has attempted to analyze the theoretical, etymological and practical aspects of this phenomenon, as well as give his forecast for further development of this phenomenon and the necessary ways to control it, suggest ways to prevent and counter the effects of «fake news» (information hoaxes). The theoretical significance of the research lies in the author’s integrated approach to the object under consideration, which allows to identify the existing gaps in the theoretical and methodological aspect of studying it.

Keywords: fake, fake news, hoax, information hoax, information security, information policy, information space, Internet, media, man, communication, information, information confrontation

Text: PDF

For citation: Golovatskaya O.E. The Meaning and the Origin of “Fake news” Concept. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 139–152. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-139-152.

References
Allcott H., Gentzkow M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 211–36.
Baym G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers. P 214.
Borden S.L., Tew C. (2007). The role of journalist and the performance of journalism: Ethical lessons from «fake» news (seriously). Journal of Mass Media Ethics. Vol. 22. No. 4. P. 300-314.
Chudinov A.N. (ed.) (1894). Dictionary of foreign words that are included in the Russian language. St. Petersburg: Publishing house V.I. Gubinsky (In Rus.).
Conroy N. J., Rubin V. L., Chen Y. (2015). Automatic deception detection: Methods for finding fake news. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol.52 No. 1. P. 1-4.
Dal V. (1979). Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language: in 4 volumes/ V. Dal, Vol. 2. Moscow (In Rus.).
Golovatskaya O.E. (2018). Fake as a tool of mass disinformation and one of the threats to the information space. In: State administration and development of Russia: challenges and opportunities. Collection of articles of the international conference session. Vol. 3 / ed. G.Y. Ivleva. M.: Publishing House «Scientific Library». P. 810-817.
Golovatskaya O.E. (2018). Information expansion as a hidden threat of the information space and a tool for targeted impact on the target audience (variants of the term interpretation and negative consequences). Communicology (Russia). Vol. 6. No.3. P.105-117. (In Rus.).
Ilchenko S.N. (2015). Fake as a political format in the modern media environment. Humanitarian vector. Series: History, political science. No. 3 (43). Р. 98-100 (In Rus.).
Kucharski A. (2016). Post-truth: Study epidemiology of fake news. Nature. Vol. 540. №. 7634. Kuznetsov S.A. (2000). Great Dictionary of Russian language. Reference edition. SPb.: Norint
(In Rus.).
Lebedeva I.V. (2013). Fake as a sociocultural phenomenon of modern society. Humanitarian Studies. No. 2. Р. 157-165 (In Rus.).
Literary encyclopedia: in 11 volumes (1934). Vol.7. M.: OGIZ RSFSR, State vocabulary-encyclopedic publishing house «Sov. Encycl.» (In Rus.).
Nazaretyan A.P. (2001). Psychology of spontaneous mass behavior. Lectures: PER SE / A.P. Nazaretyan. Moscow (In Rus.).
Newman N. (2017). et al. Reuters institute digital news report 2017.
Pavlenkov F.F. (1907). The dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language is compiled according to the Encyclopedic Dictionary of F. Pavlenkov with corresponding abbreviations in the explanation of words and additions to their number. 2nd ed. S.-Peterburg: Typography Y.N. Erlikh (In Rus.).
Pervukhin A.A. (2012). Theoretical aspects of the concept of «media hoax». Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. No. 32 (286). Philology. Art criticism. release 71. Р. 82-85 (In Rus.).
Petrs A.L. (2016). The peculiarity of the genre of literary mystification (on the material of the «Book of Veles»): master's thesis in the field 45.04.01 Philology. Barnaul (In Rus.).
Shagalova E. N. (2017). Dictionary of newest foreign words / E. N. Shagalova. Moscow: ASTPRESS (In Rus.).
Silverman C., Singer-Vine J. (2016). Most Americans who see fake news believe it, new survey says. In: BuzzFeed News.
Sorokin Y.S. (ed.) (2001). Dictionary of the Russian language of the XVIII century. Academy of Sciences of the USSR. Institute of Russian Language, Leningrad branch, 1984-1991. Issue 12. L.: Science/ SPb.: Nauka (In Rus.).
Tandoc Jr E.C., Lim Z.W., Ling R. (2018). Defining «fake news» A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism. Vol. 6. No. 2. Р. 137-153.


PR Communication in Public Administration (on the eхample of Sverdlovsk Region)

Author: Nikitina A.S., Kuznetsova Y.M., Sergeeva T.A.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Nikitina Alena Sergeevna, Cand. Sc. (Soc.), associate professor at Ural Institute of Management, RANEPA.
Kuznetsova Yulia Maratovna, senior lecturer at Ural Institute of Management, RANEPA.
Sergeeva Tatiana Alexandrovna, senior lecturer at Ural Institute of Management, RANEPA.

Abstract. The article deals with communicative aspects of PR-services in government structures. The authors propose a system of criteria and indicators of the effectiveness of modern PR-services in public authorities, considered their theoretical and methodological testing in the Department of information policy of the Sverdlovsk region; conducted an empirical study of PR-activities of the department of information policy of the Sverdlovsk region by such methods as: analysis of documents, information materials, website, publications in the media, interviews with PR-service; identified the main problems. The conclusions formulated in the course of the research can be the basis for the organization of PR-service in the public authority or improvement of its activities. In addition, the results of the study can provide valuable information for further scientific development of public relations issues.

Keywords: communicology, PR-services, public authorities, information policy, public service, efficiency of PR-services

Text: PDF

For citation: Nikitina A.S., Kuznetsova Y.M., Sergeeva T.A. PR Communication in Public Administration (on the example of Sverdlovsk Region). Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 123–138. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-123-138.

References
Dahl R. (2006). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Efimov A.A. (2015). Digital Democracy in the UK: Theory and Practice of Public Administration and the Provision of Public Services to the Population. Economic, Social and Humanitarian Studies. No. 1 (5). P.126-133 (In Rus.).
Garnett J. (2001). The Jossey Bass Public Administration Series. 1st ed., Kindle Edition. Gerbner G. (1967). Mass Media and Human Communication Theory. In: Dance F.K. (ed.), Human
Communication Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. P. 40–57.
Kozbanenko V.A. (2011). Public administration: fundamentals of theory and organization. M.: Status (In Rus.).
Kozlov S.V. (2014). Public Relations in Government. Novosibirsk (In Rus.).
Kuzmin M. (2013). 14 most successful initiatives of the US government in social networks. ECM Journal [el. source]: https://ecm-journal.ru (In Rus.).
Markov A.A. (2014). Public Relations in Government. M.: Infra-M (In Rus.).
Novikov D.V. (2013). Theory and practice of public relations. Komsomolsk-on-Amur (In Rus.). Parfenchik A.A. (2017). The use of social networks in public administration. Issues of state and
municipal management. No.2. P.186-200 (In Rus.).
Parsons T. (1969). The Social System. N.Y.: OUP.
Rosen F. (ed., 2007). Jeremy Bentham / ed. by Frederick Rosen. International Library of Series: Essays in Social History and Political Thought. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Shalimova L.A. (2014). Historical foundations of public relations and their modern legal regulation. Power. No.2. P.73-77 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2001a). The Origins and Paradigms of Social Communication Research. Sociological Studies. No. 8. P. 52–61 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2001b). Training of Public Relations Professionals. Education and Society. No.2(8) [el. source]:  http://www.jeducation.ru/2_2001/sharkow.html (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2016). Sociology of communications in the structure of the interdisciplinary scientific direction “Communicology”. Sociological Studies. No. 12. P. 128-134 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I., Baranova V.I. (2005). Audience and Media Monitoring. Sociological Studies. No.
10. P. 106–110 (In Rus.).
Trow M. (1973). Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, Berkeley [el. source]: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/ search/detailmini.
Vasilyeva M.M. (2017). Public Relations in Government. M.: Yurayt (In Rus.).
Zaitseva E.M. (2016) Public Relations Models Implemented in Public Administration. Issues of Management. No. 43. P. 45 (In Rus.).


Communication Studies within the Context of the Development of the Technosphere and Digital Technology

Author: Bogatyreva T.G.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Bogatyreva Tatiana Georgievna, Dr.Sc.(Cult.), Professor, Expert of Graduate School of Public Administration, RANEPA.

Abstract. The paper is dedicated to the genesis of communication studies in the development of anthropo-techno sphere and digital technologies. The author reveals the most significant prospects for further complication of the structure of communicology, expanding its research capabilities in the study of socio-humanitarian projection of convergent technologies.

Keywords: the genesis of communication studies, social and humanitarian aspects of network communications in socio-anthropo-techno-environment, pancommunication, identity in cyberspace

Text: PDF

For citation: Bogatyreva T.G. Communication Studies within the Context of the Development of the Technosphere and Digital Technology. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 83–96. DOI 10.21453 / 2311-3065-2019-7-2-83-96.

References
Alekseev I.Y., Arshinov V.I., Chekletsov V.V. (2013). “Technopeople” against “postpeople”: NBICS-revolution and the future of human. Questions of philosophy. No. 3 (In Rus.).
Arshinov V.I., Svirski Y.I. (2016). Complexity World and Its Observer. Part 2. Philosophy of Science and Technology. Vol.21 No.1 (In Rus.).
Budanov V.G. (2016). The New Digital Technological Lifestyle: Prospects and Risks of Anthroposphere Transformations. Philosophical Sciences. No.3 (In Rus.).
Chekletsov V.V. (2012). Hybrid reality NBICS, as the interface man/machine. Workbooks on bioethics. Issue 13: Man – NBIC machine: a study of the metaphysical foundations of innovative anthropological-technical projects. M.: Mos. humanitarian univ. (In Rus.).
Chekletsov V.V. (2014). From industry 4.0 to nature 2.0. Philosophical Studies. No. 11 (In Rus.). Converging Technologies and the Natural, Social and Cultural World (2004). Special Interest Group Report for the European Commission via an Expert Group on Foresighting the New Technology Wave. Eds.: W. Bibel, D. Andler, O. da Costa, G. Kppers, I.D. Pearson [el.source]: http://foresight. jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/converging_technologies.pdf.
Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science (2003) / Eds. M.C. Roco, W.S. Bainbridge. National Science Foundation: Report [el.source]: http://www.wtec.org/ConvergingTechnologies/Report/ NBIC_report.pdf.
Digital Ethics (2016). Brussels 1March Workshop Report [el.source]: https://digitalenlightenment. org/system/files/digital_ethics_workshop_report_v2.pdf.
Franich A. (2016). How the mixed reality will change communication, cooperation and your workplace [el.source]: https://rb.ru/story/future-of-the-workplace/ (In Rus.).
Grebenshchikova E.G. (2012). Technology foresight: from predictions to design of the future. Workbooks on bioethics. Issue 13: Man – NBIC machine: a study of the metaphysical foundations of innovative anthropological-technical projects. M.: Mos. humanitarian univ. (In Rus.).
Gulyaeva A. (2017). Future of communication: mixed virtual reality. AR-expert Mark Billinghurst shared his vision of communication systems of the future [el.source]: https://apptractor.ru/info/ articles/budushhee-obshheniya-smeshannaya-a-ne-virtualnaya-realnost.html (In Rus.).
Information and communication in the digital age / Ugra Declaration (2018). Final document of the International conference “Information and Communication in the Digital Age: Explicit and Implicit impacts” Khanty-Mansiysk, 4-8 June 2018 (In Rus.).
Internet of things. Privacy and Security in a Connected World (2015). FST Staff Report [el.source]: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/federal-trade-commission-staff-reportnovember-2013-workshop-entitled-internet-things-privacy/150127iotrpt.pdf.
In: Behavioral Economics and Future Markets Formation. Materials of the VII International Sociological Grushin Conference, March 15-16, 2017. P. 1701-1703 (In Rus.).
Leshkevich T.G. (2017). “Global modern” and a new understanding of subjectivity. The Age of globalization. No. 3 (In. Rus.).
Lisovsky S. (2016). The End of the analog world: industry 4.0, or what the fourth industrial revolution will bring with itself [el.source]: https://theoryandpractice.ru/posts/14610-konets-analogovogomira-industriya-4-0-ili-chto-prineset-s-soboy-chetvertaya-promyshlennaya-revolyutsiya (In Rus.).
Makhrov A. (2018) Portrait in the network [el.source]: https://vtbrussia.ru/tech/portret-vseti/#carddevelopment1 (In Rus.).
Managing Nano-Bio-Info-Cogno Innovations: Converging Technologies in Society (2005) ed. William Sims Bainbridge and Mihail C. Roco / National Science and Technology Council’s Subcommittee on Nanoscale Science, Engineering, and Technology.
Mitin V. (2014). Neuronet (NeuroWeb) will be the next generation of the Internet [el.source]: https://libre.life/7523/0307/5/ru (In Rus.).
Paradigm of complexity in perspective of philosophical strategy of Gilles Deleuze (2016). Papers of the “Round table”. Philosophy of Science and Technology. Vol.21. No.2 (In Rus.).
Security for the Digital World within an Ethical Framework (2016) by The Digital Enlightenment Forum. IOS Press (In Rus.).
Sergeev S.F. (2013). Global technogenic environments in the evolution of human civilization. Bulletin of the Witte Moscow University. Series 1: Economics and management. No.1 (In. Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2018). Communication paradigm of Jiri Schubert in his Russian writings. Communicology. Vol. 6. No. 6 (In. Rus.).
Socio-anthropological Measurements of Convergent Technologies. Models, predictions, risks (2017). Collective monograph / Arshinov V. I., Aseeva, A. I., Budanov V. G., Grebenshchikova E. G., Grimov O. A., Kamenskiy E. G., Mainzer, K., Mayakova, A.V., Moskalev I. E., Pirozhkov S. V., Suschyn
M. A., Chekletsov V. V., Chernikova I. V. Kursk: University book (In Rus.).
Socio-humanitarian risks of development of NBIC-technologies. (2016). Moscow, Institute of philosophy, RAS, April 2016. Round table. Philosophical Studies. No. 10 (In Rus.).
Startsev A.A., Grishanin N.V., Kirillina N.V. (2018). Identity and Identification in Social Networks. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 6. No.4. P. 76-87 (In Rus.).
Vadim Chekletsov: Bodily chronotope: the embodiment of the digital eternity (2014) [el.source]: http://gridology.ru/streams/external/8/external_posts/4114 (In Rus.).


Socio-Anthropological Features of Journalistic Discourse in the Context of Media Communication

Author: Khasavov A.D. 

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Khasavov Arslan Dagirovich, postgraduate student at the department of business and political journalism of the the Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, RANEPA.

Abstract. The article puts forward the author’s hypotheses about the genre nature of the modern journalistic text, which in the todays realities is embodied in the media format, corresponding to the conditions of ‘new media’. Forms of functioning of modern journalistic discourse presuppose communicative changes in the perception of social layers and groups of journalistic texts, which entails a change in approaches to the definition of the genre nature of the text in theoretical journalism. The author represents a detailed analysis of the history of transformation of genre classification of media discourse and marks out three types of journalistic discourse: news, analytical and journalistic, giving the generalized characteristic of their social and communicative influence. Special attention is paid to the communicative features of artistic and journalistic text, a comparative analysis of journalistic and literary texts; this question remains open both in the theory of literature and in the theory of journalism. Herewith, the author proposes to resolve the scientific dispute by analyzing the impact of certain texts on the communicative processes. At the end, the author comes to the conclusion on anthropological community of literature and journalism, and outlines the principal differences of their communicative influence.

Keywords: journalistic text, communicative influence, anthropological features, genres of journalism, news text, analytical text, journalistic text, citizen journalism, author’s principle in media communications

Text: PDF

For citation: Khasavov A.D. Socio-Anthropological Features of Journalistic Discourse in the Context of Media Communication. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 67–82. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-67-82.

References
Antonov V.I. (2006). Transformation of the typological and genre systems in modern journalism: author. dis. ... Dr. Filol. sc. Saransk (In Rus.).
Aristotle (Ed. 2017). Politics / Transl. S.A. Zhebeleva. M.: AST (In Rus.).
Bakhtin M.M. (2000). Author's problem. In: Author and hero: To the philosophical foundations of the humanities. SPb (In Rus.).
Borev G. (2003). Dictionary of literary terms: 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow (In Rus.).
Bulyko A.N. (2005). Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Minsk (In Rus.). Cherepahov M.S. (1973). Problems of the theory of journalism. Moscow (In Rus.). Dobrosklonskaya T.G. (2005). Issues of studying media texts. Experience in the study of modern
English mediarechi / T.G. Dobrosklonskaya. M.: Editorial URSS (In Rus.).
Glazkova M.Y. (2010). Expressive syntax in newspaper journalism (on the material of Russianlanguage and English-language analytical socio-political articles): dis. ... Cand. Filol. Sc. Rostovon-Don (In Rus.).
Indzhiev A.A. (2007). Dictionary of literary terms for graduates and applicants. Rostov-on-Don (In Rus.).
Ivannikov S.A. (1998). Dictionary of the Russian language. SPb. (In Rus.).
Izmailyan D.B. (2012). Language implementation of the ideological component in the news media texts (on the example of the British quality press): thesis dis. ... cand. filol. sc.. Moscow (In Rus.).
Kaida L.G. (1989). The effectiveness of journalistic text. Moscow (In Rus.).
Kardumyan M.S. (2011). The language specificity of the analytical variety of the discourse of the media (on the material of articles in Russian and English): dis. cand. filol. sciences. Stavropol (In Rus.).
Klushina N.I. (2003). General features of journalistic style. In: Media Language as an Object of Interdisciplinary Research: Manual. M.: MSU Publishing House (In Rus.).
Kroychik L.E. (2005). Publicist text as a genre and as a discourse. Accents. New in mass communication. No. 3-4 (In Rus.).
Lipovetsky M.N. (2000). Russian postmodernism. Essays on historical poetics. Yekaterinburg (In Rus.).
Milevich I.G. (2004). Comparative cognitive-discursive analysis of the language of modern publicism: communication strategies. In: Russian and Comparative Philology: State and Prospects: International Scientific Conference dedicated to the 200th anniversary of Kazan University: proceedings and materials / ed. K.R. Galiullina. Kazan (In Rus.).
Ozhegov S.I. (1981). Dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow (In Rus.).
Prokhorov A.M. (1999). Great Russian Encyclopedia. Moscow (In Rus.).
Prokhorov E.P. (2000). Introduction to the theory of journalism. Moscow (In Rus.).
Skulenko M.I. (1986). The persuasive impact of journalism. Kiev (In Rus.).
Smotrova I.V. (2005). The functioning of journalistic text in the modern English-language press: on the material of quality newspapers in England and the United States of the 1990s – 2000s: dis. cand. filol. sc. Voronezh (In Rus.).
Solganik G.Y. (2007). The language of modern publicism: a collection of articles. M.: Flinta (In Rus.).
Teplyashina A.N. (2004). Satirical genres of journalism. SPb (In Rus.).
Tertychny A.A. (2002). Periodical press genres: study guide. M.: Aspect-Press (In Rus.). Turaev S.V., Timofeev L.V. (1974). A brief dictionary of literary terms. Moscow (In Rus.). Uchenov V.V. (1985). Conversations about journalism. Moscow (In Rus.).
Ushakov D.N. (2005). Dictionary of modern Russian language. Moscow (In Rus.).
Varzapova V.Y. (2017). On the issue of the functional-genre classification of media texts in the modern press. In: sc. papers “Language as a structure and social practice”. Khabarovsk (In Rus.).
Vinogradov V.V. (1963). Stylistics. The theory of poetic speech. Poetics / V.V. Vinogradov. M.: Publishing house: Acad. Of Science USSR (In Rus.).
Yurkov A.A. (2003). Ethics of journalistic creativity. SPb (In Rus.).


The Perception of Libraries by Young Audience: the approaches to the formation of publicity capital

Author: Grishanin N.V., Tulubiev V.B., Lysanova D.V., Lyubetskaya A.G.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Grishanin Nikita Vladimirovich, Cand. Sc. (Cult.), associate professor at the department of public relations and social technologies of the North-West Institute of Management, RANEPA.
Tulubiev Vadim Borisovich, postgraduate student, St. Petersburg State University of Industrial Technologies and Design.
Lysanova Darya Vladimirovna, Lyubetskaya Anna Gennadyevna – students of the North-West Institute of Management, RANEPA, employees of the research and strategic division at “LV Media”communication agency.

Abstract. The article represents an interdisciplinary discussion on advertising and PR activities of the Lermontov Interdistrict PublicLibrary System of St. Petersburg, and reveals the specific communicative features and tools aimed at formation of publicity capital and attraction of young audience. For this purpose, and in order to identify the current image of the library system, the authors have carried out an analysis of the young audience. On this ground, the authors have systematized the resources that facilitate the formation of new image characteristics of the library, and elaborated the recommendations on the development and implementation of image campaigns.

Keywords: library, library image, youth, target audience of libraries, integrated marketing communications, reputation capital, image capital, publicity capital, event

Text: PDF

For citation: Grishanin N.V., Tulubiev V.B., Lysanova D.V., Lyubetskaya A.G. The Perception of Libraries by Young Audience: the approaches to the formation of publicity capital. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 51–65. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-51-65.

References
Ananyeva E.V., Grishanin N.V. (2013). Cultural dynamics in a mass consumer society. World of science, culture, education. No. 1. P. 234-237 (In Rus.).
Bell D., Inozemtsev V.L. (2007). The Age of Disunity: Reflections on the World of the 21st Century.
M.: Center for Post-Industrial Society Studies (In Rus.).
Buzykina E.A. (2019). Management of public capital as a problem of PR-activity in a modern energy company (for example, TVEL Fuel Company Rosatom) [access mode]: https://lomonosovmsu.ru/archive/Lomonosov_2018/data/13297/73353_uid248609_report.pdf (In Rus.).
Fomicheva I.D. (2017). Media capital and its composition. Mediaskope. Issue 2 [el. journal]: http://www.mediascope.ru/2294 (In Rus.).
Gavra D.P. (2011). PR “2.0”. In: Corporate imageology [access mode]: http://www.ci-journal. ru/article/596/pr-dvanol (In Rus.).
Grishanin N.V., Brazhnikov G.A. (2015). Technological trends and their impact on the advertising and public relations market. Modern problems of science and education. No. 1-1 [access mode]: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19554 (In Rus.).
Grishanin N.V., Lutsenko Y.V. (2013). Models of urban brand formation. Modern problems of science and education. No.3. [el. source]: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=9542 (In Rus.).
Kirillina N.V. (2014). The social potential of marketing communication in urban information environment: a sociological analysis. Thesis Diss. ... Cand. Sc. (Soc.). Moscow: RANEPA (in Rus.).
Kirillina N.V. (2017). Symbolic exchange as a system characteristic of communicative practices. In: Behavioral Economics and Future Markets Formation. Materials of the VII International Sociological Grushin Conference, March 15-16, 2017. P. 1701-1703 (In Rus.).
Kudashova Y.V. (2011). Technologies of formation of public capital in the political positioning of the region. Public Administration (e-herald) [access mode]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=16919961 (In Rus.).
Musikant V.L. (2012). Psychology and sociology in advertising. M.: RIOR; INFRA-M (In Rus.). Reshetnikova I.I. (2011). Reputational capital as a factor in ensuring the competitiveness of
Russian business: theory, methodology for studying the problem of formation and management in the context of globalization of markets: dis. ... dr. econ. sc. Volgograd (In Rus.).
Toffler A. (2003). The Metamorphosis of Power: knowledge, wealth and power on the threshold of the XXI century. Moscow (In Rus.).
Yambushev V.Y. (2012). Public capital of the person as a kind of human capital. Human capital. No. 9 (45). P. 111-115 [access mode]: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22003877 (In Rus.).
Zharkova M.A., Grishanin N.V. (2015). Youth subcultures as an element of urban visual communicative space and a factor in the development of the economic component of the image of a large city (using the example of St. Petersburg). Modern problems of science and education. No. 1-1 [access mode]: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=19552 (In Rus.).


The Perception of Message in Visual Art Communication

Author: Kulik A.S. 

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Kulik Anna Sergeevna, bachelor of linguistics, postgraduate student at RANEPA, PR manager at “Koudijs MKorma

Abstract. The paper comprehensively explores the concept of communication. It highlights the relevance of visual images in the context of contemporary information culture and discloses the features of non-verbal messages. The novelty consists in author’s representation of the term “art communication”, based on the analysis of relevant sources. The concept of the “art message” is considered in-depth with particular focus on visual communication. Besides, the author reveals the differences between the visual message and the visual art message, and gives evidence to the importance of art communication within the context of modern communication environment. Special attention is paid to the consideration of aspects of human perception and the way it affects the interpretation of visual messages.

Keywords: art communication, nonverbal communication, visual communication, perception, perception experience, art, recipient, feedback, message decoding, art, modern society

Text: PDF

For citation: Kulik A.S. The Perception of Message in Visual Art Communication. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 41–50. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-41-50.

References
Baudrillard J. (2017). Fatal strategies / transl. from French Kachalova A.V. Moscow: RIPOL classic (In Rus.).
Bychkov V.V. (2016). What is art? Philosophical Journal. Vol.9. No. 4. P.18-47 (In Rus.). Drozdova A.V. (2012). Transformation of everyday human practices: from text to visual image.
Theory and practice of social development. Issue 10. P. 183-187 (In Rus.).
Drozdova A.V. (2014). Visuality as a phenomenon of the modern media community. Discussion. No. 10 (51).
Kirillina N.V. (2014). The social potential of marketing communication in urban information environment: a sociological analysis. Diss. ... Cand. Sc. (Soc.). Moscow: RANEPA (in Rus.).
Kirillina N.V. (2017). Symbolic exchange as a system characteristic of communicative practices. In: Behavioral Economics and Future Markets Formation. Materials of the VII International Sociological Grushin Conference, March 15-16, 2017. P. 1701-1703 (In Rus.).
Kleschina N.N. (2015). New words in the English language and the borrowing of anglicisms in the Russian language. Power. P. 99-102 (In Rus.).
Kuznetsova E.M. (2014). The problem of perception of a visual image // Science. Culture Art. Issue 3. P. 190-194 (In Rus.).
Morozova T.V. (2016). Why modern youth reads so little. In: Actual problems of the humanities in Russia and abroad. Collection of scientific papers on the results of the international scientific-practical conference. Sevastopol (In Rus.).
Nazarov M.M. (2004). Mass communication and society: an introduction to theory and research. Moscow (In Rus.).
Nazarov M.M., Papantim M.A. (2009). Visual images of social and marketing communication: the experience of interdisciplinary research. Moscow: Book House “LIBROKOM” (In Rus.).
Pocheptsov G.G. (2001). Communication theory. M.: Refl, Vakler (In Rus.).
Ponosov I.G. (2016). Art and the city. Moscow (In Rus.).
Rogozhnikova T.M., Navalikhina A.I. (2011). Dominant modalities of perception and their dynamics // Bulletin of the Bashkir University. Vol. 16, No. 2. P. 99-102 (In Rus.).
Rozin V.M. (2006). Visual culture and perception. How a person sees and understands the world. Moscow: ComBook (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2005). Communication theory (basic course): textbook. M.: RIP-Holding (In Rus.). Solso R. (2006). Cognitive psychology. SPb.: Peter (In Rus.).
Vasilik M.A. (2004). The science of communication or communication theory? To the problem of theoretical identification. In: Actual problems of the theory of communication. SPb.: Publishing house Sgopu (In Rus.).
Wade N.J. (2005). Perception and Illusion. Historical Perspectives. NY.
Weinstein L.A. (2004). Theory of Perception: a course of lectures. Minsk: BSU (In Rus.).


The Development of Fundamental Areas of Communicology

Author: Delokarov K.H., Kireeva O.F.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Delokarov Kadyrbech Khadzhumarovich, Dr. Sc. (Philos.), professor of RANEPA.
Kireeva Olga Feliksovna, Cand. Sc. (Soc.), associate professor of the department of trade and commodity studies of the Cheboksary Cooperative Institute (branch) of the Russian University of Cooperation.

Abstract. The paper represents a philosophical and sociological analysis of the development of a new interdisciplinary scientific direction “Communicology”, claiming the status of science. The authors note, that at present communicology is intensively constituted as the most important scientific direction, which sets as its task the systematic study of the structure, mechanisms, factors of the effectiveness of social interaction. A set of scientific and organizational measures has been implemented, in particular, the international Academy of communicology established and successfully operating under the guidance of F.I. Sharkov. The Academy regularly holds International conferences on this subject and publishes collections of works, textbooks and manuals from the cycle “Communicology”, included as a basic component in the standards of a number of training areas. Two high-rated journals are widely known in the country and abroad: “Communicology” and “Communicology: electronic scientific journal”.
The article analyzes the information and communication technologies used by the media, set out in the monograph of professors Felix Sharkov and Vladimir Silkin1. The features of functioning of print and electronic mass media in the modern world are considered. Particular attention is paid to the development of the theory of information (mainly mass media) and the practice of journalism.
The authors enter into a productive discussion on the development of theories of communicology and the interpretation of the term “communicology” at the University of Hawaii, as well as with the authors of the Norwegian Institute of Communicology, who consider it possible to describe a set of variables various communications and even all human activity.

Keywords: communicology, communication studies, media, journalism, information analytics

Text: PDF

For citation: Delokarov K.H., Kireeva O.F. The Development of Fundamental Areas of Communicology. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 25–39.
DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-25-39.

References
Andreeva G.M. (1997). Social psychology. M.: Aspect-press (In Rus.).
Arnold A.I. (1997). Global value of the XXI century // Problems of informationology and the world information community. M. P.81. ( In Rus.).
Catt I.E., Acher-Catt D. (2010). Communicology: a new science of embodied discourse . Fairlie Dickinson Univ Press.
Cooley C.H. (1909). Social organization: the study of the greater mind. New York.
Craig R.T. (1999). Theory of communication as a field. Communication Theory. No.9 (2): 119-161. DOI: 10.1111 / j.1468-2885.1999.tb00355.x.
Culture and cultural studies (2003): the dictionary / ed. A.I. Kravchenko. Moscow (In Rus.). Danakin N.S. (1997). Activity and communication. Belgorod: Center of social technologies (In Rus.). Harris R. (2002). Psychology of mass communications. SPb.: Praym (In Rus.).
Inglehart R. (1997). Postmodern: changing values and changing societies. Polis. No. 4. P. 21-22 (n Rus.).
Lanigan R.L. (1992). The human science of Communicology. Duquesne University Press. Popov V.D. (2001). Information science and information policy. Moscow (In Rus.).
Schramm W.L. (1997). The beginning of communication study in America / eds. Chaffee S., Rogers E. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
Sharkov F.I. (2002). Fundamentals of communication theory. M.: Social relations; Perspective (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2005). Communication theory. Moscow: RIP-holding. P. 9-17 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2009a). Communicology: Encyclopedic dictionary-reference / F.I. Sharkov. M.: Dashkov and K (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2009b). Interactive electronic communications (the emergence of the 4th wave).
M.: Dashkov and K (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I., Silkin V.V. (2018). Theory and practice of mass information as a fundamental direction of communicology / Ed. F.I. Sharkov. M.: Dashkov and K. (In Rus.).
Van Dijk T.A. (1985). Discourse and communication. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Zemlyanova L.M. (1999). Foreign communication studies on the eve of the information society.
M.: MSU (In Rus.).


Communication Theory by Robert T. Craig: discursive practices and interaction trends in subject control

Author: Andriyanova T.V.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
ndriyanova Tatyana Vladimirovna, Cand. Sc. (Soc.), associate professor at the depatment of sociology, Kursk State University.

Abstract. In 1999, American researcher Robert T. Craig wrote his conceptual article “Communication Theory as a Field,” which expanded the context of the discussion of disciplinary identity in the field of communication. In textbooks on communication theory at that time there was practically no agreement on what constituted her discussion field or what theories should be included in textbooks. This article, representing the field of communication, became the basis for four different textbooks on the theory of communication. Craig offers his vision of the theory of communication, which takes a huge step towards combining this rather heterogeneous field and solving its main problems. Towards this unifying vision, Craig focused on the theory of communication as a practical discipline and showed how different traditions of the theory of communication can be involved in a dialogue about the practice of communication and management. In this discourse, various scholars (S. Dietz, T. Taylor, P. Lazarsfeld, K. Arnold, N. Luhmann) enter into a dialogue on the practical refractions of communication theories. Following Craig, the author considers seven different traditions of the theory of communication in general terms and in more detail dwells on the sociopsychological and sociocultural approaches as the most promising in terms of management impact on the subject.

Keywords: communication, communication theory, disciplinary matrix, research field, control, communication subject

Text: PDF

For citation: Andriyanova T.V. Communication Theory by Robert T. Craig: discursive practices and interaction trends in subject control. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 15–24. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-15-24.

References
Arnold C.C. (1989). Rhetoric. In: E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T.L. Worth, L. Gross (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communications New York: Oxford University Press.
Berelson B.R., Lazarsfeld P.F., McPhee W.N. (1954). Voting: a study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. University of Chicago Press.
Bowers J., Iwi K. (1993). The discursive construction of society. Discourse & Society. No. 4, Р. 357-393.
Carey J.W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Winchester, MA: Unwin Hyman.
Craig R.T. (1999). Communication Theory as a Field. Communication Theory. Vol.9. Iss. 2. Р.119-161.
Cronen V.E., Pearce W.B., Changsheng X. (1989).The Meaning of «Meaning» in the CMM Analysis of Communication: A Comparison of Two Traditions. Research on Language and Social Interaction.
23 (1-4): 1-40.
Deetz S.A. (1994). Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. Annals of the International Communication Association. Vol.17. Iss.1 P. 565-600.
Ehninger D. (1968). On systems of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric. No. 1. Р. 131-144. Heritage J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Luhmann N. (1992). What is communication? Communication Theory. Vol.2. Iss.3. Р. 251-259. Schoening G.T., Anderson J.A. (1995). Social action media studies: Foundational Arguments and
Common Premises. Communication Theory. Vol.5, Iss. 2. P. 93-116.
Sharkov F.I. (2005). Social communication: origins and paradigms: Lecture. Moscow (In Rus.). Taylor T.J. (1992). Mutual misunderstanding: Scepticism and the theorizing of language and
interpretation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.


Information Noise in Infant Development: conceptual approach

Author: Polyanina A.K., Andreeva Yu.V.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Polyanina Alla Kerimovna, Cand. Sc. (Soc.), associate professor of the department of management and public administration of the Institute of Economics and Entrepreneurship of the Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorodю
Andreeva Yulia Valentinovna, Dr. Sc. (Ped.), professor of the department of television production and digital communications, Higher School of Journalism and Media Communication, Kazan Federal University.

Abstract. Recognition at the legislative level of the need to conduct comprehensive studies of the information space of modern children updates the task of analyzing new risks and threats, and the development of integrative intersectoral approaches, the attempt of which is carried out by the authors of the article.
The article represents a new concept of information noise as a risk factor in the information space of the child. In terms of the impact of digital culture on all aspects of social life the authors consider the main approaches to solving the problem of information pollution, as well as related to the informatization and mediatization of life concepts, the proposed ways of adaptation of children to a new space of adulthood, ranging from psychohygenic approaches to state-legal regulation. The correlation of the phenomenon of information noise with already established scientific categories and terms is considered in detail, the distinctive features of information noise as a factor of the space of development of the child, his mental and social well-being are indicated. The authors proceed from the correlation between the level of information noise, understood in close connection with the phenomenon of hyperstimulation of mental resources of children, and the occurrence of information stress (stress accumulation). Based on the analysis of existing approaches to the understanding of information noise, already established in science, and used in regulations terms, the development of the presented concept, the authors determine the establishment of patterns of formation of conditions, trends and trajectories of the adaptation strategies of the child’s informational behavior, ways of developing resistance to the influence of information noise, identifying the dependence of the child’s social portrait and risk.

Keywords: information noise, information hygiene, mediatization, information security of children, information overload, communications, information ecology, information pollution

Text: PDF

For citation: Polyanina A.K., Andreeva Yu.V. Information Noise in Infant Development: conceptual approach. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 109–121. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-109-121.

References
Andreev V.I., Andreeva Yu.V. (2015). Acmeoqualitative concept of development and self-development of multidimensional thinking and wisdom. Education and self-development. No. 2
(44). P. 10-15 (In Rus.).
Belousova M.V., Karpov A.M., Utkuzova M.A. (2014). The impact of gadgets on the development of communication, socialization and speech in children of early and preschool age. Practical medicine. No. 9 (85). P. 108-112 (In Rus.).
Bolshakov A.M., Krutko V.N., Kutepov E.N., Mamikonova O.A., Potemkina N.S., Rozenblit S.I., Chankov S.V. (2016). Information loads as a new relevant section of the hygiene of children and adolescents. Hygiene and Sanitation. No. 95 (2). P. 172-177 (In Rus.).
Bukhtiyarov I.V., Denisov E.I., Eremin A.L. (2014). Basics of informational hygiene: concepts and problems of innovation. Hygiene and sanitation. P. 5-9 (In Rus.).
Denisov E.I. (2019). Robots, artificial intelligence, augmented and virtual reality: ethical, legal and hygienic problems. Hygiene and sanitation. No. 98 (1). P. 5-10 (In Rus.).
Elyakov A.D. (2005). Information overload of people. Sociological studies. No.5. P. 114-121 (In Rus.).
Galkin V.P. (2005). Some aspects of the existence of natural information systems in the conditions of information noise. Problems of scientific and extra-scientific knowledge. No. 5. P. 59–67 (In Rus.).
Gordon P. (2018). Information overload in the information age: a review of the literature from business administration, business psychology, and related disciplines with a bibliometric approach and framework development. Business Research.
Kaku M. (2014). The Future of the Mind: The Scientific Quest to Understand, Enhance, and Empower the Mind.
Kiselev A.G. (2011). Theory and practice of mass media. Preparation and creation of a media text: a textbook for universities (2011) / A.G. Kiselev. SPb .: Peter (In Rus.).
Klingberg Torkel. (2010). Overflowing Brain: Information Overload and the Limits of Working Memory.
Kobrin N.V. (2014). The notion of media average in the communicative social aspect. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice. No. 7 (37). P. 86-88 (In Rus.).
Kuznetsova A.V. (2012). Problems of information and entropy in the media text: author. dis. Cand. filol. sciences. Rostov-on-Don (In Rus.).
Livingstone S. (2008). On the mediation of everything. Journal of communication. 59 (1). P. 1-18. Mironov D.F. (2015) Informational noise and educational process. Herald of St. St. Petersburg.
State Univ. of Culture and Arts. No. 4. P. 24-30 (In Rus.).
Myasoedov S.P. (2005). Cross-cultural shock and common communication errors // Personnel Management. No.3. P. 55-59 (In Rus.).
Poludina V.P. (2011). Information noise in the Internet ka problem of communication consumption. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. Vol. XIV. No. 5 (58). P. 386–394.
Polyanin A.K. (2015). The concept of information products as a key category of the system of legal support of children’s information security. Lex Russica. Vol. 108. No. 11. P. 75-82 (In Rus.).
Postman N. (1993). Technopoly: the Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: Vintage Books. Shannon C. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication.
Simmel G. (1903). Die Großstädte und das Geistesleben.
Smirnov F.P. (2007). Informational health of society as an object of state policy: dis. cand.soc. sc. St. Petersburg (In Rus.).
Ursul A.D. (2009). Information noise. Moscow: Academic Project (In Rus.). Weber M. (1925). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft.
Yavdolyuk N.V. (2011). Informational noise. Advisor. No. 6. P. 1 (In Rus.).

The Patterns of Structuring Media Consumption in the Modern Information Environment

Author: Nazarov M.M.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.2
Nazarov Mikhail Mikhailovich, leading researcher at the Institute of social and political studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor at HSE.

Abstract. Distinctive feature of the modern media environment is its fragmentation. The work contributes to the current debate on whether there is a growing “dispersion” of the audience by an increasing number of small media channels or in the current environment continue to operate patterns of structuring media consumption, which were inherent in the media space in the “pre-digital” era? The theoretical and applied basis of the work is the concept of double losses (double-jeopardy) in the media market. It is argued that the phenomenon of mass media popularity is rooted in the nature of information behavior of individuals. With regard to the Russian situation, it was revealed that for TV channels with high coverage rates, there is a great loyalty of the audience. Channels with small penetration (coverage) lose to big players also in terms of the loyalty of their viewers. It is concluded that in the framework of competition in the media market for the audience, the strategy of mass coverage is more preferable.

Keywords: media environment, media space, media popularity, information environment, media consumption

Text: PDF

For citation: Nazarov M.M. Patterns of Sstructuring Media Consumption in the Modern Information Environment. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.2. Р. 98–108. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-2-98-108.

References
American sociology: problems, prospects, methods (1972) / Ed. Osipov G.V. M.: Progress (transl. from English: American Sociology. Perspectives. Problems. Methods / Parsons T. N.Y.: Basic Books, 1968) (In Rus.).
Anderson C. (2006a). The long Tail. Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More. New York: Hyperion.
Anderson С. (2006b). The Longer Long Tail. NY. P.100-105.
Nazarov M.M. (2018). Modern media environment: diversity and fragmentation. Sociological Studies. No. 8. P. 54-64 (In Rus.).
Nazarov M.M. (2015). To the question of fragmentation of the modern media landscape: theory and empirical results. Information society. No. 2-3. P. 91-100 (In Rus.).
Political science: new directions (1999) / Ed. E.B. Shestopal. M.: Veche. P. 243-244 (In Rus.). Bairwise P., Ehrenberg, A. (1997). The Liking and Viewing of Regular TV Series. Journal of
Consumer Research. Vol. 14. June 1987. P. 63-70.
Donthy N. (2001). Double Jeopardy in Television Program Choice. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 180-185
Ehrenberg А., Goodhardt G., Barwise P. (1990). Double Jeopardy Reviseted. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 54. P. 82-91.
Ehrenberg A., Bairwise P. (1988). Television and its Audience. London: Sage.
McDowell W., Dick S. (2001). Using TV Daypart “Double Jeopardy Effects” to Boost Advertising Efficiency. Journal of Advertising Research. No. 6. P. 43-51.
McDowell W., Dick S. (2005). Revealing a Double Jeopardy Effect in Radio Station Audience Behavior. Journal of Media Economics. 18(4), 271–284.
McPhee W.N. (1963). Formal theories of mass behavior. New York: Free Press.
McQuail D. (1994). Mass Connunication Theory. An Introduction. 3rd ed. London: Sage. Morgan D. (2017). If content remains king, might data & tech make audience or performance
King Kong? Presentation on egta (European trade association TV channels and radio stations sales houses) CEO & Top Executives Summit. 08-09/06/2017, Stockholm [el. source]: http://www.egta. com/index.php?page=event-individual&idEvent=92.
Nelson J., Webster J.B., (2016). Audience Currencies in the Age of Big Data. International Journal on Media Management, 18:1. P. 9-24.
Tarkiainen A., Ellonen A. (2015). Does offline market share drive online loyalty? Double jeopardy phenomenon in the context of print magazines and magazine websites. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising. Vol. 9. No. 3.


The Writings of Vladimir Makanin in the Communicative Dialogue of the Epochs of Troubled Times: the social status of the “lost generation”

Author: Gogina L.P. 

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.1
Gogina Lyubov Petrovna, Cand. Sc. (Philol.), associate prof. at the department of business and political journalism, faculty of journalism, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, RANEPA. Address: 119571, Russia, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 84.

Abstract. The paper presents a brief essay of the life and work of the Russian writer of the last third of the XX century – the beginning of the XXI century Vladimir Makanin, characterized by the features of his prose in the framework of communicative roll of the works of writers known as ‘generation of the forties’. The author analyses the sociological aspects of the continuity of the literature of the period of ‘thaw’ (‘the sixties’) and the period of stagnation (‘the prose of the forties’).  Special attention is paid to the realistic social typicality of the characters created by the writers of this literary movement. The study represents a comparative communication analysis of writings of the ‘lost generation’ and the ‘epoch of troubled times’ in the historical and literary context: from the writings of Benjamin Constant through the oeuvres of Alexander Pushkin to the writings of Alfred de Musset as appercieved by Mikhail Lermontov – as a dialogue between the two epochs. Russian writers of the postmodern period are interpreted in this paper by the successors of the global direction of the literature of the epochs of stagnation. This kind of character of the postwar and the post-thaw period of the country’s history is characteristic of the works of Vladimir Makanin. The writings of the ‘generation of the forties’ are compared here with the program works of V. Rasputin, V. Astafiev, Ch. Aitmatov, whose books have already entered the school educational standards on the history of Russian literature as reflecting the basic realistic typologies the typical characters of the epoch, and highlighting its aesthetic and ideological distortions.

Keywords: Vladimir Makanain, sociality of the ‘prose of the forties’, Henri-Benjamin Constant de Rebecque, Alfred de Musset, historical communication, ‘the era of troubled times’, the end of the period of Soviet literature as a socio-cultural phenomena

Text: PDF

For citation: Gogina L.P.  The Writings of Vladimir Makanin in the Communicative Dialogue of the Epochs of Troubled Times: the social status of the “lost generation”. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.1. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-1-143-151.

References
Vysotsky V.S. (1981). Nerve. M.: Sovremennik (In Rus.).
Golubkov M.M. (2008). The history of Russian literary criticism of the XX century (1920-1990s): Textbook. M.: Academy (In Rus.).
Dedko I. (1981). When the lyrical fog cleared.... Literary Review. No. 9 (In Rus.).
Kurchatkin A. (1981). The burden of calm. Literary Review. No. 8 (In Rus.). Makanin V.S. (2012). River with fast flowing. Coll. of writings. M.: Eksmo (In Rus.).

Transformation of Рolitical Сommunication in the Сontext of the Dynamics of Modern Power Elites

Author: Rodionov M.A., Volkova T.A.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.1
Rodionov Mihail Alexandrovich, Dr. Sc. (Milit.), professor at the department of national security, RANEPA;
Volkova Tatiana Aleksandrovna, head of the legal support department, CJSC «Leader». Address: 119571, Russia, Moscow, Vernadsky av. 82.

Abstract. The article dwells upon the theory and practice of political communications in the modern conditions of the functioning of power elites, in conjunction with the dynamics of global geopolitical changes. Analyzing the transformation of political communications, we illustrate anti-crisis aspects, issues of information security as an integral part of national security, the processes of forming national identity, issues of competitiveness, coherence of political elites.

Keywords: political communication, political system, power elite, political elite, information security, national identity, competitiveness, coherence of political elites, crisis management, historical analysis

Text: PDF

For citation: Rodionov M.A., Volkova T.A. Transformation of Рolitical Сommunication in the Сontext of the Dynamics of Modern Power Elites. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.1. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-1-128-142.

References
Balz D., Guskin E. (2016).  In Every State, Pessimism about Trump, Clinton and the Impact of the Election [access mode]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/in-every-state-pessimism-about-trump-clinton-and-the-impact-of-the-election/2016/09/06/ecff15d0-739a-11e6-b786-19d0cb1ed06c_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.b3701ce3ead1.
Bernays E. (2016). Crystallization of public opinion. Per. from English M.: Williams (In Rus.).
Bodrunova S.S. (2010). Modern strategies of British political communication. M.: Partnership of scientific publications KMK (In Rus.).
Castells M. (2017). The power of communication / M. Castells; transl. N.M. Tylevich; per. from English foreword to ed. 2013 A.A. Arkhipova; 2nd ed. M.: Higher School of Economics (In Rus.).
Fukusaku K., Hirata А. (1995). OECD and ASEAN: Changing Economic Linkages and the Challenge of Policy Coherence’, in ‘OECD and the ASEAN Economies: the Challenge of Policy Coherence’. OECD.
Jackson D., Thorsen E., Wring D. (2016). EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Early reflections from leading UK academics. The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community. Bournemouth University. Dorset Digital Print Ltd. P. 33.
Khakimzhanov S., Seytenova Ai-Gul S. (2013). In search of coherence: the trade and industrial policy of Kazakhstan. No. 18. Institute of Public Administration and Policy (In Rus.).
Krestinina E.S. (2011). Formation of European political identity in the context of European integration. // Identity as a subject of political analysis. Collection of articles on the results of the All-Russian Scientific-Theoretical Conference (IMEMO RAN, October 21-22, 2010). M., IMEMO RAN. P. 109-110 (In Rus.).
Larina E., Ovchinsky V. (2017). US intelligence: crime, terrorism and new technologies in the near future. The report of the US National Intelligence Council “Global trends: the paradoxes of progress” [el. source]: http://zavtra.ru/blogs/authors/14599 (In Rus.).
Prangishvili I.V. (2003). Entropy and other systemic laws: Questions of control of complex systems. Inst of problems of management. V.A. Trapeznikova. M.: Science. P. 105 (In Rus.).
Rodionov M.A. (2009). Socio-political security of Russia. Tutorial. M.: RAGS (In Rus.).
Rodionov M.A., Volkova T.A. (2014). Political communications and power. Communicology. Vol.6, No. 4 (In Rus.).
Rodionov M.A., Volkova T.A. (2016). Political elite: history and modernity: Monograph. M.: Social and Humanitarian Knowledge (In Rus.).
Rodionov M.A., Volkova T.A. (2018). Political elites and national identity. Social and humanitarian knowledge. No.4. P. 126-137 (In Rus.).
Sanzharevsky I.I. (2004). Proportionality in modern socio-political relations / Ed. prof. V.M. Dol-gov. Saratov (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I., Silkin V.V., Abramova I.E., Kirillina N.V. (2018). Violation of Information Ecology in Media Space. RUDN Journal of Sociology, 18 (4), 765-775.
The foundations of the constitutional system of Russia: twenty years of development (2013). / Ed. A.N. Medushevsky. M.: Institute of Law and Public Policy (In Rus.).
Yasin E.G. (2005). Will take root democracy in Russia. M.: New Publishing (In Rus.).

Actant Interaction in Traditional Religious Culture in the Secular USSR

Author: Tsyplakov D.A., Tsyplakova S.M.

Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.1
Tsyplakov Dmitry Anatolyevich, Cand. Sc.(Philos.), associate prof. at the Novosibirsk National State Research University;
Tsyplakova Svetlana Mihailovna, Cand. Sc. (Cult.), associate prof. at the Department of Socio-Cultural Activities of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University. Address: 630090, Russia, Novosibirsk.

Abstract. Traditional religious culture has undergone visible transformation in the conditions of Soviet secularization. Nevertheless, religion remains an element of social communication and social interaction in the space of culture. Taking into account this aspect is inevitable in the explication of cultural patterns in religious, sociological and historical research works. This paper shows how traditional religious customs and traditions existed in the space of the immanent framework of secular Soviet culture mainly in rural areas. The publication deals with the structure of the life world of the Soviet people based on the actant analysis. An important point in the modern history of our country was the return of religion to the life of society. At the same time, traditional religions in this return relied on folk customs and traditions preserved during the period of Soviet secularization.

Keywords: secularization, religious structures of life-world, interaction, soviet traditions

Text: PDF

For citation: Tsyplakov D.A., Tsyplakova S.M. Actant Interaction in Traditional Religious Culture in the Secular USSR. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No1. DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-1-113-126.

References
Berger P.L. (1969). The Social Reality of Religion. L.: Faber.
Divisenko K.S. (2013). The experience of the structural-semantic analysis of the autobiographical narrative.  Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling. No. 36. P. 94-112 (In Rus.).
Evstigneeva N.V., Oberemko O.A. (2007). Narrative Analysis Models. Man. Community. Social Control. No.4. P. 95-107 (In Rus.).
Frank S.L. (1992). The spiritual foundations of society. M.: Republic. (In Rus.).
Martin D. (1969). The Religious and the Secular: Studies in Secularization, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.
Schutz A. (2004). Methodology of social sciences. (Transl.). M.: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN) (In Rus.).
Schutz A., Luckmann T. (1973, 1983). The Structures of the Life-World. Vol. 1, 2.
Stepanova E.A. (2014). Soviet atheism in the context of multiple modernity. Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Applied Physics and Ural Division, Russian Academy of Sciences. No.2. P.67-82 (In Rus.).
Taylor C. (2007). A Secular Age. Harvard University Press, Massachusetts; London.
Taylor C. (2011). What does secularism mean? // Taylor Ch. Dilemmas and Connections. Selected Essays. Cambridge, MA; London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Tsyplakov D.A., Tsyplakova S.M. (2011). Earthly and heavenly: stages of secularization of Russian sacred music. Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. No.5-4. P. 204-207 (In Rus.).
Yurchak A. (2014). It was forever, until it was over. The last Soviet generation. M.: New Literary Review (In Rus.).