Ethical aspects of influence Internet communication on the development of consciousness

Author: Victoria L. Izmagurova

Communicology. 2017. Vol.5. No.4
Izmagurova Victoria Leonidovna – the candidate of psychological sciences, the associate professor of department of organizational design of control systems of Institute of Public Administration and Management of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA). Address: 84, Vernadskogo prospekt, Moscow, Russian Federation 119571. Ph.: +7(499)956-90-21. E-mail: izmagurova@mail.ru.

Abstract. As a result of the development of modern ICT (infocommunication technologies), communication and, in particular, the exchange of information acquire not only a new form, but also new content. This transformation takes place, first of all, under the influence of communication, mediated by the Internet.
In connection with the active introduction of ICT in private and public life, the actual issue for researchers is the influence of modern Internet communication technologies on the socialization of the subject, which can be called info-socialization.
Specificity of the form of communication on the Internet is as follows: the invisibility and anonymity of the subject of communication; Weak regulation of behavior; The choice of a communication environment, ways of self-presentation, a sense of permissiveness. On the Internet we have social uncertainty of role behavior, violation of the usual subordination, the opportunity to get acquainted with information of a private nature. It is obvious that the new way of communication – the Internet – changes deeply and radically not only the form of communication, but also its content. The openness of a person in the network, and often in the case when he appears incognito, hiding behind a nickname, allows him to declare about his needs, emotions, expressing them directly, in particular, ignoring the norms of ethics and morality.
Productive use of ICT based on the realization of human value system, harmonization of the hierarchy of needs. Including, awareness of the basic need for communication, in action for the Other. This allows us to select and create information on the Internet that contributes to the achievement of the constructive goals; Determine the developing circle of communication, form optimal reference groups.

Keywords: Internet obshenie, Internet communication, development of consciousness, information society, communication risks, content risks, network ethics

Text: PDF

For citation: Victoria L. Izmagurova. Ethical aspects of influence Internet communication on the development of consciousness. Communicology. Vol. 5. No. 4. 2017. P. 59-70 DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2017-2-2-59-70

References
1. Andreeva G. M. Social'naya psihologiya. M.: Aspekt Press. 2017. 363 s.
2. Baeva L. V. E'tika informacionnogo mira: problemy stanovleniya i razvitiya/ Filosofiya i kul'tura/ 2016. 4(100) S. 514-522 / DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2016.4.17665
3. Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost'/ Sankt-Peterburg: Piter. 2008. 240 s.
4. Bell D. Gryadushchee postindustrial'noe obshchestvo. Opyt social'nogo prognozirovaniya.
M.: Academia. 2004. 788 s.
5. Viner N. Kibernetika i obshchestvo. M.: Tajdeks Ko. 2002. 186 s.
6. Deklaraciya principov «Postroenie informacionnogo obshchestva – global'naya zadacha v novom tysyacheletii»/ Vsemirnyi sammit po informacionnomu obshchestvu/ http://www.ifapcom. ru/files/3-Deklaratsiya_printsipov_postr-infobschestva-Zheneva.doc
7. Draker P. Postkapitalisticheskoe obshchestvo (1995)/ Novaya postindustrial'naya volna na Zapade. Antologiya/ Pod redakciej V. L. Inozemceva. M.: Academi. 1999. 640 s.
8. Zhilkin V. V. Infosocializaciya – sushchnost' ponyatiya/ Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana). 2007. №1. S. 37-48.
9.  Kastel's M. Informacionnaya e'poha: e'konomika, obshchestvo i kul'tura. Gos. un-t. Vyssh. shk. e'konomiki. M.: 2000. 606 s.
10.  Kutyrev V. A. Duhovnost', e'konomizm i tehnologiya: drama vzaimodejstviya/ Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. 2012. №1 (3). C. 55-63.
11.  Leont'ev D. A., Osin E. N. Smysloutrata i otchuzhdenie/ Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psihologiya. 2007. №4. C. 68-77.
12.  Mal'kova E.YU. Principy virtual'noj e'tiki/ Seriya «Symposium». Religiya i nravstvennost' v sekulyarnom mire. Vypusk 20/ Materialy nauchnoj konferencii. 28-30 noyabrya 2001 god Sankt-Peterburg: Sankt-Peterburgskoe filosofskoe obshchestvo. 2001.C.112-115.
13. Mid M. Kul'tura i mir detstva. M.: Glavnaya redakciya vostochnoj literatury izdatel'stva «Nauka». 1988. 285 s.
14. Podpisan zakon o vozrastnoj markirovke, kotoryi dolzhen zashchitit’ detej ot vrednoj informacii. 2016/ https://news.tut.by/society/496659.html
15. Soldatova G. V. «Internet: vozmozhnosti, kompetencii, bezopasnost'». 2013. http://detionline. com/internet-project/training-aids
16. Toffler E'. «Tret'ya volna». M.: Izdatel'stvo ACT. 2004. 261 s.
17. Chusavitina G.N., CHernova E.V., Makashova V.N., Zerkina N.N., Kuznecova I.M. E'ticheskie voprosy primeneniya informacionnyh tehnologii kak komponenta predmetnogo soderzhaniya podgotovki studentov universiteta/ Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. 2015. № 10-2. S. 318-323.
18. Ethical code of Information society. 36 general conference of UNESCO/http://unesdoc. unesco.org/images/0021/002126/212696e.pdf 19. Masyda Y. The Information Society as Postindustrial Society. Tokio. 1981.
20. Shea V. The Core Rules of Netiquette (1994). URL: http://www.albion.com/netiquette/ corerules.html