Author: Golubeva O. Yu., Fedyaev A. P.
Communicology. 2017. Vol.5. No.3
Olga Y. Golubeva. PhD (psych.), associate professor of department Socially cultural activity and pedagogics of the Kazan State Institute of Culture (Kazan, Orenburg tract, 3), 2595234@mail.ru;
Alexander P. Fedyaev, Dr.Sci. (philos.), prof. of department of history, philosophy and cultural science of the Kazan State Institute of Culture (Kazan, Orenburg tract, 3). E-mail: info@kazgik.ru
Abstract. in this article the content of the processes which led to formation in VIII II century of century BC of culturally world outlook bases of a modern civilization reveals. It is noted that in formation of culture of modern society the special role was played by spiritual heritage of the Ancient East. The attempt of judgment of questions of emergence of Axial time and the subsequent processes of formation and formation of universal cultural values, outlooks, moral standards, philosophical and religious concepts, family values, political movements, economic components, etc. is made. In article of an interpreted a role of such thinkers of antiquity as Moisey, Ekhnaton and Zoroastr. It is proved that the cultural history is history of alternation of uplifts and falling of mankind. Sources of emergence of spirituality as special sociocultural phenomenon reveal. The assumption is made that growth of anti-spirituality in the modern world is temporary and it is caused by the processes happening, first of all, in the European culture defining today the main standards of world culture. Authors come to a conclusion that increase in level of spirituality of modern mankind is possible only on condition of use of spiritual potential of east culture.
Keywords: sense of history, Axial time, Ekhnaton, Zoroastr, culture of the Ancient East, cultural values
Text: PDF
For citation: Golubeva O. Yu., Fedyaev A. P. Spiritual predecessors of «Axial time» and modern culture: philosophical and cultural analysis. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 5. No. 3. S. 121-130 DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2017-5-3-121-130
References
1. K. Jaspers. 1994. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Respublika, 528 s. [Jaspers K. 1994. Sense and purpose of history. M.: Respublika , 528 p.]. (In Russ.).
2. Dzh.Dzh. Frjezer. 2003. Zolotaja vetv': Issledovanie magii i religii. M.: AST. Ermak, 781s. [Frezer J.J. 2003. Gold branch: Research of magic and religion. Moscow: Yermak, 781 p.]. (In Russ.).
3. N.A. Berdjaev. 2003. Dialektika bozhestvennogo i chelovecheskogo. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 620 s. [ Berdyaev N. A. 2003. Dialectics divine and human. Moscow: Publishing House AST Ltd, 620 p.]. (In Russ.).
4. A. Men'. 2005. Magizm i edinobozhie. M.: Jeksmo, 704 s. [Men A. 2005. Magizm and monotheism. Moscow: Eksmo, 704 p.]. (In Russ.).
5. Je. Ceren. 2002. Biblejskie holmy. SPb.: izdatel’skij dom «Litera», 512s. [Tseren E. 2002. Bible hills. SPb.: Litera publishing house, 512 p.]. (In Russ.).
6. A.G. Ovchinnikova. 2002. Legendy i mify Drevnego Vostoka. SPb.: izdatel'skij dom «Litera», 512 s. [Ovchinnikova A. G. 2002. Legends and myths of the Ancient East. SPb.: Litera publishing house, 512 p.]. (In Russ.).
7. M. Bjukaj. 2001. Biblija, Koran i nauka: svjashhennye pisanija v svete sovremennogo znanija. Kiev: Ansar Faundejshn, 351 s. [Bukaj M. 2001. Bible, Koran and science: the sacred writing in the light of modern knowledge. Kiev: Ansar Faundeyshn, 351 p.]. (In Russ.).
8. A.P. Fedjaev. 2014. Jehnaton i kul'tura Drevnego mira // Vestnik KemGUKI, №28, S.165-170. [Fedyaev A.P. 2014. Ekhnaton and culture of the Ancient world. Messenger KEMGUKI, No. 28. P. 165-170.]. (In Russ.).
9. Gaty Zaratushtry. Iz «Avesty». «Jasna», 28 (Molenie o slove) / Biblioteka vsemirnoj literatury v 200 t.t. M.: «Hudozhestvennaja literatura», 1973. Vol. 1. [Ghats of Zaratushtra. From Avesta. 1973. «Is clear», 28 (A prayer for the word) / Library of the world literature in 200 т.т. Moscow: «Fiction», Vol.1.]. (In Russ.).
10. M. Bojs. 1987. Zoroastrijcy. Verovanija i obychai. M.:Nauka, 303 s. [Boyce M. 1987. Zoroastrians. Beliefs and customs. Moscow: Science, 303 p.]. (In Russ.).
Communicology. 2017. Vol.5. No.3
Olga Y. Golubeva. PhD (psych.), associate professor of department Socially cultural activity and pedagogics of the Kazan State Institute of Culture (Kazan, Orenburg tract, 3), 2595234@mail.ru;
Alexander P. Fedyaev, Dr.Sci. (philos.), prof. of department of history, philosophy and cultural science of the Kazan State Institute of Culture (Kazan, Orenburg tract, 3). E-mail: info@kazgik.ru
Abstract. in this article the content of the processes which led to formation in VIII II century of century BC of culturally world outlook bases of a modern civilization reveals. It is noted that in formation of culture of modern society the special role was played by spiritual heritage of the Ancient East. The attempt of judgment of questions of emergence of Axial time and the subsequent processes of formation and formation of universal cultural values, outlooks, moral standards, philosophical and religious concepts, family values, political movements, economic components, etc. is made. In article of an interpreted a role of such thinkers of antiquity as Moisey, Ekhnaton and Zoroastr. It is proved that the cultural history is history of alternation of uplifts and falling of mankind. Sources of emergence of spirituality as special sociocultural phenomenon reveal. The assumption is made that growth of anti-spirituality in the modern world is temporary and it is caused by the processes happening, first of all, in the European culture defining today the main standards of world culture. Authors come to a conclusion that increase in level of spirituality of modern mankind is possible only on condition of use of spiritual potential of east culture.
Keywords: sense of history, Axial time, Ekhnaton, Zoroastr, culture of the Ancient East, cultural values
Text: PDF
For citation: Golubeva O. Yu., Fedyaev A. P. Spiritual predecessors of «Axial time» and modern culture: philosophical and cultural analysis. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 5. No. 3. S. 121-130 DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2017-5-3-121-130
References
1. K. Jaspers. 1994. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Respublika, 528 s. [Jaspers K. 1994. Sense and purpose of history. M.: Respublika , 528 p.]. (In Russ.).
2. Dzh.Dzh. Frjezer. 2003. Zolotaja vetv': Issledovanie magii i religii. M.: AST. Ermak, 781s. [Frezer J.J. 2003. Gold branch: Research of magic and religion. Moscow: Yermak, 781 p.]. (In Russ.).
3. N.A. Berdjaev. 2003. Dialektika bozhestvennogo i chelovecheskogo. M.: OOO «Izdatel'stvo AST», 620 s. [ Berdyaev N. A. 2003. Dialectics divine and human. Moscow: Publishing House AST Ltd, 620 p.]. (In Russ.).
4. A. Men'. 2005. Magizm i edinobozhie. M.: Jeksmo, 704 s. [Men A. 2005. Magizm and monotheism. Moscow: Eksmo, 704 p.]. (In Russ.).
5. Je. Ceren. 2002. Biblejskie holmy. SPb.: izdatel’skij dom «Litera», 512s. [Tseren E. 2002. Bible hills. SPb.: Litera publishing house, 512 p.]. (In Russ.).
6. A.G. Ovchinnikova. 2002. Legendy i mify Drevnego Vostoka. SPb.: izdatel'skij dom «Litera», 512 s. [Ovchinnikova A. G. 2002. Legends and myths of the Ancient East. SPb.: Litera publishing house, 512 p.]. (In Russ.).
7. M. Bjukaj. 2001. Biblija, Koran i nauka: svjashhennye pisanija v svete sovremennogo znanija. Kiev: Ansar Faundejshn, 351 s. [Bukaj M. 2001. Bible, Koran and science: the sacred writing in the light of modern knowledge. Kiev: Ansar Faundeyshn, 351 p.]. (In Russ.).
8. A.P. Fedjaev. 2014. Jehnaton i kul'tura Drevnego mira // Vestnik KemGUKI, №28, S.165-170. [Fedyaev A.P. 2014. Ekhnaton and culture of the Ancient world. Messenger KEMGUKI, No. 28. P. 165-170.]. (In Russ.).
9. Gaty Zaratushtry. Iz «Avesty». «Jasna», 28 (Molenie o slove) / Biblioteka vsemirnoj literatury v 200 t.t. M.: «Hudozhestvennaja literatura», 1973. Vol. 1. [Ghats of Zaratushtra. From Avesta. 1973. «Is clear», 28 (A prayer for the word) / Library of the world literature in 200 т.т. Moscow: «Fiction», Vol.1.]. (In Russ.).
10. M. Bojs. 1987. Zoroastrijcy. Verovanija i obychai. M.:Nauka, 303 s. [Boyce M. 1987. Zoroastrians. Beliefs and customs. Moscow: Science, 303 p.]. (In Russ.).
