Author: Viktorova E.V., Badaeva E.R.
Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.1
Viktorova Elena Viktorovna, Cand. Sc. (Ped.), associate professor at the department of theory and practice of social work, Penza State University;
Badaeva Elena Ravilevna, asst. chair at the department of theory and practice of social work, Penza State University. Address: 440026, Russia, Penza, Krasnaya st., 40.
Abstract. In this paper we consider the specificity of the functioning of the effects of informational impact on a person in the Internet space. At the same time, the effects are presented as «old», that is, long known to science and widespread in the media, and «new» – for some technical reasons, appearing only in the global network or reproducing the already known ways of influence in new Internet conditions.
Among the effects of informational impact we distinguish «effects-means», «effects-results» and «effects-impressions». We draw a particular attention to the so called «effects-impressions», which by their nature and socio-cultural consequences are close to such a way of social influence on a person, as impressing. Besides, we reveal the conditions for the occurrence of effects, the nature of which can be considered as impressing-caused: situations of emotional vulnerability, critical periods of personal development and a predisposition to certain socio-cultural influences. It is shown that the coincidence of these conditions increases the effectiveness of both «old» and «new» effects of informational influence on the Internet.
Keywords: Internet, information, effects of informational impact, impressing, public consciousness, social environment
Text: PDF
For citation: Viktorova E.V., Badaeva E.R. The ‘New’ and the ‘Old’ Socio-Cultural Effects of Informational Impact in the Internet Space. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.1.
DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-1-100-112.
References
Adamyants T.Z. (2016). Latent technologies of information wars and “double” standards. Sociological studies. No.12. P. 123–127 (In Rus.).
Efroimson V.P. (2010). Genetics of genius. Biosocial mechanisms and factors of the highest intellectual activity. M.: Time of knowledge (In Rus.).
Hepp A., Krotz F. (2014). Mediatized Worlds. Culture and Society in a Media Age. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ignatiev V.I. (2017). Information overload of the social system and its social consequences. Sociological studies. No.7. P. 3–12. DOI: 10.7868 / S0132162517070017 (In Rus.).
Keen J. (2015). Democracy and media decadence. M.: HSE Publishing House (In Rus.).
Kirillina N.V. (2017). Symbolic exchange as a system characteristic of communicative practices. In: VII International Grushin Conference “Towards the Future. Forecasting in sociological research”. March 15-16, 2017. P. 1701-1703.
Kravchenko S.A. (2016). Sociology of risk and safety. M.: Yurayt (In Rus.).
Kulikov L.V. (2011). Socio-psychological aspects of the influence of the media on the mind. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 12. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University. Issue 11. P. 3–12 (In Rus.).
McLuhan M. (2003). Understanding Media: External Human Extensions (transl.). M.: Kuchkovo Pole (In Rus.).
Melnik G.S. (1996). Mass Media: Psychological processes and effects. St. Petersburg: St.Petersburg University Publishing House (In Rus.).
Nazarov M.M., Kovalev P.A. (2017). Changes in the media environment and modern reading practice. Sociological Studies. No.2. P. 84–95 (In Rus.).
Pressman J. (2014). Digital Modernism: Making it New in New Media. NewYork: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Ryzhov V.V., Telepova N.N. (2015). Information space of the Internet as an addictive factor of influence on a person. Modern problems of science and education. No.2 (part 2) [el. source]: http:// www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=22027 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2017). Communicative provocation or provocation in the theory and practice of communication (reflections on the communicative component of provocation). Communicology. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 167–177. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2017-5-4-167-177 (In Rus.).
Sheldon K.M., Abad N., Hirsch C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 100. P. 766–775. DOI: 10.1037/a0022407.
Valkenburheueg P.M., Peter J., Walther J.B. (2016). Media Effects: Theory and Research // Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 67. Р. 315–338. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608
Viktorova E.V., Batkaeva E.R. (2017). The impression as a component and a factor of socialization in the communicative space of the Internet. Communicology. Vol. 5. No.1. P. 88-98. DOI 10.21453/ 2311-3065-2017-5-1-88–98 (In Rus.).
Young K. (1998) Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction-and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. NY: Cambridge University Press.
Communicology. 2019. Vol.7. No.1
Viktorova Elena Viktorovna, Cand. Sc. (Ped.), associate professor at the department of theory and practice of social work, Penza State University;
Badaeva Elena Ravilevna, asst. chair at the department of theory and practice of social work, Penza State University. Address: 440026, Russia, Penza, Krasnaya st., 40.
Abstract. In this paper we consider the specificity of the functioning of the effects of informational impact on a person in the Internet space. At the same time, the effects are presented as «old», that is, long known to science and widespread in the media, and «new» – for some technical reasons, appearing only in the global network or reproducing the already known ways of influence in new Internet conditions.
Among the effects of informational impact we distinguish «effects-means», «effects-results» and «effects-impressions». We draw a particular attention to the so called «effects-impressions», which by their nature and socio-cultural consequences are close to such a way of social influence on a person, as impressing. Besides, we reveal the conditions for the occurrence of effects, the nature of which can be considered as impressing-caused: situations of emotional vulnerability, critical periods of personal development and a predisposition to certain socio-cultural influences. It is shown that the coincidence of these conditions increases the effectiveness of both «old» and «new» effects of informational influence on the Internet.
Keywords: Internet, information, effects of informational impact, impressing, public consciousness, social environment
Text: PDF
For citation: Viktorova E.V., Badaeva E.R. The ‘New’ and the ‘Old’ Socio-Cultural Effects of Informational Impact in the Internet Space. Communicology (Russia). 2019. Vol. 7. No.1.
DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-1-100-112.
References
Adamyants T.Z. (2016). Latent technologies of information wars and “double” standards. Sociological studies. No.12. P. 123–127 (In Rus.).
Efroimson V.P. (2010). Genetics of genius. Biosocial mechanisms and factors of the highest intellectual activity. M.: Time of knowledge (In Rus.).
Hepp A., Krotz F. (2014). Mediatized Worlds. Culture and Society in a Media Age. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ignatiev V.I. (2017). Information overload of the social system and its social consequences. Sociological studies. No.7. P. 3–12. DOI: 10.7868 / S0132162517070017 (In Rus.).
Keen J. (2015). Democracy and media decadence. M.: HSE Publishing House (In Rus.).
Kirillina N.V. (2017). Symbolic exchange as a system characteristic of communicative practices. In: VII International Grushin Conference “Towards the Future. Forecasting in sociological research”. March 15-16, 2017. P. 1701-1703.
Kravchenko S.A. (2016). Sociology of risk and safety. M.: Yurayt (In Rus.).
Kulikov L.V. (2011). Socio-psychological aspects of the influence of the media on the mind. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Series 12. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University. Issue 11. P. 3–12 (In Rus.).
McLuhan M. (2003). Understanding Media: External Human Extensions (transl.). M.: Kuchkovo Pole (In Rus.).
Melnik G.S. (1996). Mass Media: Psychological processes and effects. St. Petersburg: St.Petersburg University Publishing House (In Rus.).
Nazarov M.M., Kovalev P.A. (2017). Changes in the media environment and modern reading practice. Sociological Studies. No.2. P. 84–95 (In Rus.).
Pressman J. (2014). Digital Modernism: Making it New in New Media. NewYork: Oxford Scholarship Online.
Ryzhov V.V., Telepova N.N. (2015). Information space of the Internet as an addictive factor of influence on a person. Modern problems of science and education. No.2 (part 2) [el. source]: http:// www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=22027 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2017). Communicative provocation or provocation in the theory and practice of communication (reflections on the communicative component of provocation). Communicology. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 167–177. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2017-5-4-167-177 (In Rus.).
Sheldon K.M., Abad N., Hirsch C. (2011). A two-process view of Facebook use and relatedness need-satisfaction: Disconnection drives use, and connection rewards it // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 100. P. 766–775. DOI: 10.1037/a0022407.
Valkenburheueg P.M., Peter J., Walther J.B. (2016). Media Effects: Theory and Research // Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 67. Р. 315–338. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608
Viktorova E.V., Batkaeva E.R. (2017). The impression as a component and a factor of socialization in the communicative space of the Internet. Communicology. Vol. 5. No.1. P. 88-98. DOI 10.21453/ 2311-3065-2017-5-1-88–98 (In Rus.).
Young K. (1998) Caught in the Net: How to Recognize the Signs of Internet Addiction-and a Winning Strategy for Recovery. NY: Cambridge University Press.
