Author: Natalia V. Kirillina
Communicology. 2018. Vol.6. No.2
Natalia Vladimirovna Kirillina, Cand. Sc. (Soc.), associate professor at the department of public relations and media policy, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, RANEPA. Address: 119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 82. E-mail: nata. kirillina@gmail.com.
Abstract. The paper is dedicated to the influe nce of digital technologies and multimedia on the formation and development of the social space of a modern city. Digital reproduction of information, multireference of modern information systems exert an implicit influence on the formation of the urban environment and predetermine its perception by social actors – citizens and external audiences. In the context of the approach by A. Lefebvre (‘the right to the city’), information and its accessibility are treated as immanent to the life of a modern civilized city and constitutes the inalienable right of citizens. The author brings up the point of roles distribution in the communicative chain in urban spaces and the role of technical and technological mediators in this process: search engines, mobile operators, urban information resources and databases.
Keywords: informatization, urbanization, urban environment, social design of urban space, communication management
Text: PDF
For citation: Kirillina N.V. The Enjoyment of Right to the City: data representation and rendering in urban information environment. Communicology (Russia). 2018. Vol. 6. No.2. P. 116-123. DOI 10.21453 / 2311-3065-2018-6-2-116-123.
References
Castells M. (1992). European Cities, the Information Society and the Global Economy. Amsterdam: Centrum.
Graham M., Zook M., Boulton A. (2013). Augmented Reality in Urban Places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3). P.: 464–479.
Graham S., Marvin S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
Granovetter M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6). P.: 1360–1380.
Harvey D. (1989). The Urban Experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jeffres L., Lin C. (2006). Metropolitan Websites as Urban Communication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00303.x.
Kitchin R., Dodge M. (2011). Code/Space. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lasswell H. (1948). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. In Schramm W. (ed.) (1960). Mass Communications (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. P.117-129.
Lefebvre H. (1968). Le Droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos (In Fr.).
Lefebvre H. (1991). The Production of Space / transl. D. Nicholson‐Smith. Oxford: Blackwell. Lefebvre H. (2003). The Urban Revolution / transl. R. Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mitchell D. (2003). The Right to the City: social justice and the fight for public space. NY, L.: Guilford Press.
Park R. (1967). The City as a Social Laboratory. In: Robert E. Park On Social Control and Collective Behavior / Selected Papers. Chicago, London: Phoenix Books, The University Of Chicago Press. P. 3-18.
Porter M.E. (1995). The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, 73(3). P. 55–71.
Purcell M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58. P. 99-108.
Shaw J., Graham M. (2017). An Informational Right to the City? Code, Content, Control, and the Urbanization of Information. Antipode: a radical journal of geography, 49(4). P. 907-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.1231.
Wright C.R. (1986). Mass Communication: a sociological perspective. 3d ed. Random House.
Communicology. 2018. Vol.6. No.2
Natalia Vladimirovna Kirillina, Cand. Sc. (Soc.), associate professor at the department of public relations and media policy, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, RANEPA. Address: 119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 82. E-mail: nata. kirillina@gmail.com.
Abstract. The paper is dedicated to the influe nce of digital technologies and multimedia on the formation and development of the social space of a modern city. Digital reproduction of information, multireference of modern information systems exert an implicit influence on the formation of the urban environment and predetermine its perception by social actors – citizens and external audiences. In the context of the approach by A. Lefebvre (‘the right to the city’), information and its accessibility are treated as immanent to the life of a modern civilized city and constitutes the inalienable right of citizens. The author brings up the point of roles distribution in the communicative chain in urban spaces and the role of technical and technological mediators in this process: search engines, mobile operators, urban information resources and databases.
Keywords: informatization, urbanization, urban environment, social design of urban space, communication management
Text: PDF
For citation: Kirillina N.V. The Enjoyment of Right to the City: data representation and rendering in urban information environment. Communicology (Russia). 2018. Vol. 6. No.2. P. 116-123. DOI 10.21453 / 2311-3065-2018-6-2-116-123.
References
Castells M. (1992). European Cities, the Information Society and the Global Economy. Amsterdam: Centrum.
Graham M., Zook M., Boulton A. (2013). Augmented Reality in Urban Places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3). P.: 464–479.
Graham S., Marvin S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.
Granovetter M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6). P.: 1360–1380.
Harvey D. (1989). The Urban Experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Jeffres L., Lin C. (2006). Metropolitan Websites as Urban Communication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00303.x.
Kitchin R., Dodge M. (2011). Code/Space. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lasswell H. (1948). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. In Schramm W. (ed.) (1960). Mass Communications (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. P.117-129.
Lefebvre H. (1968). Le Droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos (In Fr.).
Lefebvre H. (1991). The Production of Space / transl. D. Nicholson‐Smith. Oxford: Blackwell. Lefebvre H. (2003). The Urban Revolution / transl. R. Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Mitchell D. (2003). The Right to the City: social justice and the fight for public space. NY, L.: Guilford Press.
Park R. (1967). The City as a Social Laboratory. In: Robert E. Park On Social Control and Collective Behavior / Selected Papers. Chicago, London: Phoenix Books, The University Of Chicago Press. P. 3-18.
Porter M.E. (1995). The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, 73(3). P. 55–71.
Purcell M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58. P. 99-108.
Shaw J., Graham M. (2017). An Informational Right to the City? Code, Content, Control, and the Urbanization of Information. Antipode: a radical journal of geography, 49(4). P. 907-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.1231.
Wright C.R. (1986). Mass Communication: a sociological perspective. 3d ed. Random House.
