Author: Alexander D. Nazarov, Inna S. Korableva
Communicology. 2018. Vol.6. No.1
Alexander Danilovich Nazarov, Dr. Sc. (Hist.), Professor at the department of public relations and media policy of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, member of the Commission on Information Support of the State National Policy of the Presidential Council on Interethnic Relations;
Inna Sergeevna Korableva, head for Chinese and Asian affairs, international relations department of TASS Russian News Agency, graduate student of the department of public relations and media policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. Address: 119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 84. E-mail: ad.nazarov@migsu.ranepa.ru.
Abstract. The Great Silk Road has appeared as a unique communication project in the history of human civilization. Its current state, the history of its emergence and its two thousand-year existence, which allowed the achievements of Chinese science and technology to Europe, as well as the philosophical and religious views of the Heavenly Empire, attracts the attention of scientists all over the world. This paper gives a brief, meaningful review of the current state of the study of the modernized version of the Great Silk Road as applied to the era of globalization. The authors indicate the unused reserves and opportunities of the scientific, technical, business, trade, intellectual potential of China and neighboring countries in line with this trunk.
Keywords: The Great Silk Road, scientific and technical relations, trade relations, humanitarian cooperation, ethno cultural and multi-religious communication, media exchange
Text: PDF
For citation: Nazarov A.D., Korableva I.S. The Great Silk Road as a Unique Communication Project in Human Civilization History: lessons, problems, and prospects. Communicology (Russia). 2018. Vol. 6. No. 1 P. 119-128. DOI 119-128.
References
Bakhvalov T. (2017). The Silk Diplomacy: PRC continues to hold on the five key principle of creation of a new global order. The Breath of China. No.6. P. 11-13 (In Rus.).
Bordachev T. (2017). Not to miss the moment of Eurasia: how to make a confluence working. Russia in Global Affairs. Vol. 13. No.5 (In Rus.).
Formation and development of the Great Silk Road routes in the Central Asia in antiquity and the middle ages: theses of reports of UNESCO international workshop. Samarkand, Oct. 1-6, 1990. Ed. A.A. Askarov. Tashkent: Fan, 1990 (In Rus.).
Frankopan P. (2018). The Silk Road. Transl. V.Y. Sharshukovoy. Moscow: Izdatelstvo E (In Rus.). Gorbacheva V. (2017). BRICS: strengthening partnership for a sustainable future. The Breath of
China. No.6. P. 16-20 (In Rus.).
Hansen V. (2014). The great silk road: a new history. Transl. S.A. Belousov. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Tsentrpoligraf (In Rus.).
Kashkin B.V. (2007). The basics of communication theory: a brief course. Minsk: Kharvest; Moscow: Vostok-Zapad (In Rus.).
Nazarova H.A. (2017). To the origins of the theory and practice of social communication in various spheres of modern society. Communicology. Vol. 5. No.4. P. 159-166 (In Rus.).
Nazarova H.A., Dmitriev A.V. (2016). Migration processes in the context of Eurasian realities. Social-Human Knowledge. No.5. P.160-170 (In Rus.).
Politov Y. (2017). Bound with a belt of friendship. The Breath of China. No. 3. P.4-8 (In Rus.). Potcheptsov G.G. (2001). The communication theory. Мoscow: REFL-book; Kiev: Vakler (In Rus.). Qin Y., Zhou G., Lo W. (2017). One belt and one way: comments / Transl. L.K. Stanchenko. Moscow:
International Publishing Group Chance (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2014). Communicology. The basics of communication theory. Moscow: Dashkov & Co (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2015). Information and communication paradigm of development of the state: civilization, above-culture, above-religion aspects. Islam in Modern World. Vol. 11. No. 3 P.175-182 (In Rus.).
Skriba A.S. (2016). Sopryazhenie EAES i ekonomicheskogo poyasa shelkovogo puti: interesy uchastnikov i vyzovy realizacii [Association of EEU and the Economic belt of the Silk Road: the interests of the participants and the challenges of implementation. In: Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizatsiy (Bulletin of International Organizations). Vol.11. No.3. P. 67-81 (In Rus.).
Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary (1987) / Ed. A.M. Prokhorov. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia (In Rus.). Strelkov A.M., Torchinov E.A., Mongush M.V., Ryabov S.V. (2006). Buddhism. Canons. History.
Arts. Moscow: Design. Information. Cartography (In Rus.).
The illustrated encyclopedia ‘Russika’. The history of the ancient world. (2004) Moscow: OLMAPRESS Education (In Rus.).
Vorobyev V.Y. (2014). The new silk line. On the Chinese concept of economic space of the Silk Road. Russia in Global Affairs. No. 3. P. 142-151 (In Rus.).
Communicology. 2018. Vol.6. No.1
Alexander Danilovich Nazarov, Dr. Sc. (Hist.), Professor at the department of public relations and media policy of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, member of the Commission on Information Support of the State National Policy of the Presidential Council on Interethnic Relations;
Inna Sergeevna Korableva, head for Chinese and Asian affairs, international relations department of TASS Russian News Agency, graduate student of the department of public relations and media policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. Address: 119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 84. E-mail: ad.nazarov@migsu.ranepa.ru.
Abstract. The Great Silk Road has appeared as a unique communication project in the history of human civilization. Its current state, the history of its emergence and its two thousand-year existence, which allowed the achievements of Chinese science and technology to Europe, as well as the philosophical and religious views of the Heavenly Empire, attracts the attention of scientists all over the world. This paper gives a brief, meaningful review of the current state of the study of the modernized version of the Great Silk Road as applied to the era of globalization. The authors indicate the unused reserves and opportunities of the scientific, technical, business, trade, intellectual potential of China and neighboring countries in line with this trunk.
Keywords: The Great Silk Road, scientific and technical relations, trade relations, humanitarian cooperation, ethno cultural and multi-religious communication, media exchange
Text: PDF
For citation: Nazarov A.D., Korableva I.S. The Great Silk Road as a Unique Communication Project in Human Civilization History: lessons, problems, and prospects. Communicology (Russia). 2018. Vol. 6. No. 1 P. 119-128. DOI 119-128.
References
Bakhvalov T. (2017). The Silk Diplomacy: PRC continues to hold on the five key principle of creation of a new global order. The Breath of China. No.6. P. 11-13 (In Rus.).
Bordachev T. (2017). Not to miss the moment of Eurasia: how to make a confluence working. Russia in Global Affairs. Vol. 13. No.5 (In Rus.).
Formation and development of the Great Silk Road routes in the Central Asia in antiquity and the middle ages: theses of reports of UNESCO international workshop. Samarkand, Oct. 1-6, 1990. Ed. A.A. Askarov. Tashkent: Fan, 1990 (In Rus.).
Frankopan P. (2018). The Silk Road. Transl. V.Y. Sharshukovoy. Moscow: Izdatelstvo E (In Rus.). Gorbacheva V. (2017). BRICS: strengthening partnership for a sustainable future. The Breath of
China. No.6. P. 16-20 (In Rus.).
Hansen V. (2014). The great silk road: a new history. Transl. S.A. Belousov. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Tsentrpoligraf (In Rus.).
Kashkin B.V. (2007). The basics of communication theory: a brief course. Minsk: Kharvest; Moscow: Vostok-Zapad (In Rus.).
Nazarova H.A. (2017). To the origins of the theory and practice of social communication in various spheres of modern society. Communicology. Vol. 5. No.4. P. 159-166 (In Rus.).
Nazarova H.A., Dmitriev A.V. (2016). Migration processes in the context of Eurasian realities. Social-Human Knowledge. No.5. P.160-170 (In Rus.).
Politov Y. (2017). Bound with a belt of friendship. The Breath of China. No. 3. P.4-8 (In Rus.). Potcheptsov G.G. (2001). The communication theory. Мoscow: REFL-book; Kiev: Vakler (In Rus.). Qin Y., Zhou G., Lo W. (2017). One belt and one way: comments / Transl. L.K. Stanchenko. Moscow:
International Publishing Group Chance (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2014). Communicology. The basics of communication theory. Moscow: Dashkov & Co (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2015). Information and communication paradigm of development of the state: civilization, above-culture, above-religion aspects. Islam in Modern World. Vol. 11. No. 3 P.175-182 (In Rus.).
Skriba A.S. (2016). Sopryazhenie EAES i ekonomicheskogo poyasa shelkovogo puti: interesy uchastnikov i vyzovy realizacii [Association of EEU and the Economic belt of the Silk Road: the interests of the participants and the challenges of implementation. In: Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizatsiy (Bulletin of International Organizations). Vol.11. No.3. P. 67-81 (In Rus.).
Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary (1987) / Ed. A.M. Prokhorov. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia (In Rus.). Strelkov A.M., Torchinov E.A., Mongush M.V., Ryabov S.V. (2006). Buddhism. Canons. History.
Arts. Moscow: Design. Information. Cartography (In Rus.).
The illustrated encyclopedia ‘Russika’. The history of the ancient world. (2004) Moscow: OLMAPRESS Education (In Rus.).
Vorobyev V.Y. (2014). The new silk line. On the Chinese concept of economic space of the Silk Road. Russia in Global Affairs. No. 3. P. 142-151 (In Rus.).
