Author: Vladimir V. Silkin
Communicology. 2017. Vol.5. No.6
Silkin Vladimir Vladimirovich, Dr. Sc. (Pol.), head of Department of journalism, head of Department of information management, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA). Address: 119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 84. E-mail:
vv.silkin@migsu.ranepa.ru.
Abstract. There are three main ways of political communication implemented in the communicative space: through informal contacts, through socio-political organizations (institutions) and through the media. Communicative space represents a specific form of vital activity of society, in which the possibility of the organization of social relations and interactions of individuals, social groups and institutions of government and society are realized through communication. Hence, political communication allows reflecting the specific content of functionally delineated and spatially defined communicative processes in the public administration system, where social and political information is being qualitatively transformed. In this regard, it is important to analyze the spatial characteristics of political communication, to identify the main elements and dynamics of political communication in conditions of socio-political transformations and the development of the information society. The term of ‘Information-communication’ here refers to specific mass-media activity related to the search and transmission of actual social information in digital form to a mass audience and thereby serving as an information communicatorship.
Keywords: social communication, political communication, political space, a space of political communication, information and communication, mediacracy
Text: PDF
For citation: Vladimir V. Silkin. Information and Communication Management in the Political Space of Society. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 5. No.6. P. 15-30 DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2017-5-6-15-30.
References
Baudrillard J. (2000). In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities. Moscow (In Rus.).
Bourdieu P. (1993). Sociology of Power. Moscow. P. 36 (In Rus.).
Grachev M.N. (1999). Political Communication. Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Political science. No.1.
P. 24 (In Rus.).
Dzyaloshinsky I.M. (2000). On some of the causes of ‘weird’ behavior of Russian journalists in election campaigns of 1999-2000. Media and Politics in Russia. Moscow. P. 10-11 (In Rus.).
Koltsova E.Y. (1999). Theory of Mass Communication. Sociological Journal. No. 1-2. P. 81 (In Rus.). Moscovici S. (1998). Gods Making Machine. Moscow (In Rus.).
General and applied political science (1997). Moscow. P. 36 (In Rus.).
Popov V.D. (2001). Information science and information policy. Moscow. P. 22-23 (In Rus.). Pugachev V.P. (1999). Information and financial totalitarianism: Russian experiment on the
American scenario. Vestnik MGU: Political science. No.4. (In Rus.).
Simonov A. (2001). Media in the CIS: twilight of freedom? Moscow (In Rus.).
Fromm E. (1990 a). To Have or to Be. Moscow (In Rus.).
Fromm E. (1990 b). Escape from Freedom. Moscow. P. 227 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2017). Communicative Provocation, or Provocation within the Theory and Practice of Communication: reflections on the communicative part of the provocation. Communicology. 2017. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 167-177 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I., Buzin V.N. (2014). Mass communication and media planning. M.: Dashkov and Co. (In Rus.).
Sinne K. (1975). Communication: Mass Political Behavior. Political Communication Issues and Strategies for Research. Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications. P. 73.
Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. (2017). Neighboring Countries’ Images: persistent stereotypes of the Russian student youth. RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 17, No.3. P. 338-347 (In Rus.).
Habermas J. (1990). Die Moderne – Ein unvollendetes Projekt: Philosophisch-politische Aufsätze 1977-1990. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag. P. 203.
Communicology. 2017. Vol.5. No.6
Silkin Vladimir Vladimirovich, Dr. Sc. (Pol.), head of Department of journalism, head of Department of information management, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA). Address: 119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 84. E-mail:
vv.silkin@migsu.ranepa.ru.
Abstract. There are three main ways of political communication implemented in the communicative space: through informal contacts, through socio-political organizations (institutions) and through the media. Communicative space represents a specific form of vital activity of society, in which the possibility of the organization of social relations and interactions of individuals, social groups and institutions of government and society are realized through communication. Hence, political communication allows reflecting the specific content of functionally delineated and spatially defined communicative processes in the public administration system, where social and political information is being qualitatively transformed. In this regard, it is important to analyze the spatial characteristics of political communication, to identify the main elements and dynamics of political communication in conditions of socio-political transformations and the development of the information society. The term of ‘Information-communication’ here refers to specific mass-media activity related to the search and transmission of actual social information in digital form to a mass audience and thereby serving as an information communicatorship.
Keywords: social communication, political communication, political space, a space of political communication, information and communication, mediacracy
Text: PDF
For citation: Vladimir V. Silkin. Information and Communication Management in the Political Space of Society. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 5. No.6. P. 15-30 DOI 10.21453/2311-3065-2017-5-6-15-30.
References
Baudrillard J. (2000). In the Shadow of the Silent Majorities. Moscow (In Rus.).
Bourdieu P. (1993). Sociology of Power. Moscow. P. 36 (In Rus.).
Grachev M.N. (1999). Political Communication. Vestnik RUDN. Ser.: Political science. No.1.
P. 24 (In Rus.).
Dzyaloshinsky I.M. (2000). On some of the causes of ‘weird’ behavior of Russian journalists in election campaigns of 1999-2000. Media and Politics in Russia. Moscow. P. 10-11 (In Rus.).
Koltsova E.Y. (1999). Theory of Mass Communication. Sociological Journal. No. 1-2. P. 81 (In Rus.). Moscovici S. (1998). Gods Making Machine. Moscow (In Rus.).
General and applied political science (1997). Moscow. P. 36 (In Rus.).
Popov V.D. (2001). Information science and information policy. Moscow. P. 22-23 (In Rus.). Pugachev V.P. (1999). Information and financial totalitarianism: Russian experiment on the
American scenario. Vestnik MGU: Political science. No.4. (In Rus.).
Simonov A. (2001). Media in the CIS: twilight of freedom? Moscow (In Rus.).
Fromm E. (1990 a). To Have or to Be. Moscow (In Rus.).
Fromm E. (1990 b). Escape from Freedom. Moscow. P. 227 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I. (2017). Communicative Provocation, or Provocation within the Theory and Practice of Communication: reflections on the communicative part of the provocation. Communicology. 2017. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 167-177 (In Rus.).
Sharkov F.I., Buzin V.N. (2014). Mass communication and media planning. M.: Dashkov and Co. (In Rus.).
Sinne K. (1975). Communication: Mass Political Behavior. Political Communication Issues and Strategies for Research. Vol. 4. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications. P. 73.
Narbut N.P., Trotsuk I.V. (2017). Neighboring Countries’ Images: persistent stereotypes of the Russian student youth. RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 17, No.3. P. 338-347 (In Rus.).
Habermas J. (1990). Die Moderne – Ein unvollendetes Projekt: Philosophisch-politische Aufsätze 1977-1990. Leipzig: Reclam Verlag. P. 203.
